[Dr. Franklin]

The judge acted correctly. A court can only determine whether an election was UNLAWFUL for failing to follow the state's election laws. It cannot prescribe a remedy due to the 'plenary powers' state legislatures have with respect to election laws.

Rights without remedies aren't really rights. Common law courts have powers for dealing with issues like this. These issues should have been addressed prior to certifying the election, or immediately thereafter. Doing nothing just showed contempt for the law and the very concept of open, free and fair elections which are required for a government to be a republic.

[RideForever]

The judge acted correctly. A court can only determine whether an election was UNLAWFUL for failing to follow the state's election laws. It cannot prescribe a remedy due to the 'plenary powers' state legislatures have with respect to election laws.

Rights without remedies aren't really rights.

The remedy is for the electorate to elect moral representatives in their state and national elections that can follow the US Constitution. Thus the two bodies elected directly by We the People is the source of the remedy. Not the courts. Not the Governors or President.