Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: amorphous

I’m confused. Why would the Hyde Amendment need to be added to this bill? It’s already in effect - if anything, this bill would need to explicitly be worded for it to not apply.


35 posted on 03/06/2021 8:21:04 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Svartalfiar
It's complicated. But as usual, the demos find ways around the blocking of funds for Planned Parenthood.

The $350 billion state bailout funds are particularly problematic as the bill doesn’t prevent states and localities from using taxpayer funds to pay for abortions. Under the current guidelines, liberal states like New York and California, which are likely going to receive the lion’s share of the bailout, can funnel millions to abortion giants like Planned Parenthood if they choose.

“While prior bipartisan COVID relief packages have included Hyde protections on funding streams that fall outside of existing limits on abortion funding, this bill departs from the status quo by leaving funds open to use for abortion. COVID relief money should be used for life-affirming purposes… we strongly support and will score in favor of amendments to mitigate the funding of abortion, abortion coverage, or abortion providers,”

Pro-abortion forces emboldened by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are shamelessly exploiting the COVID-19 crisis to expand abortion on demand, paid for by taxpayers. By failing to include Hyde Amendment protections and forcing taxpayers to bail out the abortion industry, their so-called ‘rescue plan’ abandons some of the most vulnerable Americans – unborn children and their mothers.

36 posted on 03/06/2021 8:28:09 PM PST by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson