Posted on 03/05/2021 5:39:30 AM PST by Kid Shelleen
April is shaping up as quite an exciting month!
The Left’s Revolution Is Just Getting Started – More Riots Are Planned!
3/5/2021, 9:24:53 AM · by MtnClimber · 6 replies
AND Magazine ^ | 2 Mar, 2021 | Charles “Sam” Faddis
i am too old and set in my ways to accommodate the feelings of others... hehehe...
if people are not strong in their own convictions, nothing i can do will change that, i figure. lots of people keep asking what i think, and most are sorry for doing so, but i call it like i see it, as i expect from others, but there are a lot of people out there seeing things that aren’t the way they happened.
i am secure enough in my researching of things to form a decent opinion on most things.
the search for small t truth is never complete... big T Truth, i have my faith in it. the world of men will always be an interesting arena.
Someday, I expect QAnon to be revealed as a creation of Hillary Clinton.
:^) Absolutely! Besides, I doubt any of the mockingbird media have bothered to read Q postings (drops). It is much easier and quicker to just say that 'Q followers' are rioters, seditionists... bed wetters.
Whatever Q is - or was - it was viciously attacked almost right from the start, a curious phenomenon. I mean, it is not like the media has hounded the KKK or other fringe groups; but they focused in on Q quickly and now uses Q as a cult of followers that blindly obey as they are led.
People will believe what they want to believe. Most of the media are obedient ignoramuses. That TV news anchor in Arizona nailed it well this week; her integrity finally got the best of her after 20 years of just reading whatever was handed to her.
“ i am too old and set in my ways to accommodate the feelings of others... hehehe...”
That’s ok... I probably shouldn’t have said anything...
you good. i love debate, but some things will not change.
be safe
I love debate too...
But.critical thinking seems to be a lost art - the founding documents and other writings from the past are the only sources of what I can respect as fair debate.
In the present day, what passes for debate and discourse is full of lies and deception on the Left, and fantasy and fallacy on the Right.
There were rules that applied to the use of language for constructive argument, that have been cast aside in order to accommodate agenda, emotion and pride.
I understand why the Left s tempted - they know their evil thrives in deception and darkness.
But I see many on the Right falling for a temptation too - they are not satisfied to be humble servants like President Trump - they want to believe they are the chosen people - they imagine themselves vessels.
Q followers should go back and read the founding documents - they are full of humility. The founders’ argument for Liberty was not based on smug self-assurance that they were the exclusive keepers of God’s Plan. It was based on the opposite - a humble respect for disparate views and beliefs of individuals - a wariness of organized religion and others groupings - the need to protect individuals from groups.
You appear to be brainwashed.
Let us examine the facts. Q said Trump would remain President and be re-inaugurated on January 20. When that didn't happen Q said the re-inauguration would happen on March 4. That also didn't happen. Q also said many prominent Democrats would be arrested. Didn't happen. When a given source continues to be wrong I stop treating that source as credible. What do you do sir?
Have you read any Q posts?
Yes, I have read a few Q droppings. The name is quite fitting.
Can you verify a Q quote advocating any violence?
Can you show me where in my post I said there was a Q quote advocating any violence?
It might surprise you to know that I did not follow Q for his 'predictions'; those prove normal human fallibility. I know some put high stock in them - a matter of choice.
***Can you show me where in my post I said there was a Q quote advocating any violence?***
My argument is against the article which evinces a classic symptom of growing autocratic rule... using the term 'Q theorists' thus creating a class that needs to be suppressed. The same charge could be made against those that 'follow the Bible' or 'follow John Paul Sartre' or 'follow the Farmers almanac.' It is an ignorant way to classify people. Within that class will be a wide number of variations, not an autonomous obedient group marching to orders from on high.
There are numerous 'trolls' that now invade the Q thread to continuously charge us with our stupidity. Obviously it is people who have nothing better to do with their lives that are stupid... such is human nature and ever more shall be so.
I perhaps overstated my frustration in charging you with possible brainwashing. Every troll invading the Q thread assumes that their view of Q IS what Q is about. As I say, I follow Q for a different reason and I feel no need to justify or explain it to anyone. Sorry for the remark, although I point out that I did NOT say that you ARE brainwashed... like Q I am just challenging you to think for yourself. ;^)
As a Q enthusiast, I will say that most you label as followers are at best, enthusiasts. And yes, the founders were pro individual rights and most Q enthusiasts support, this one does. I believe the biggest problem is comprehension skills amongst both sides of the arguments and a desire not to see the other sides point or right to express it, but the desire to shut down what they think the other side stands for.
In the end, one side is pro government and the other pro individual.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.