Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maddog55

The last three paragraphs are required reading LOL!

“But it’s an open question whether the Air Force will ever succeed in developing a light, cheap fighter...”


14 posted on 02/25/2021 4:18:00 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

The F-16 was supposed to be a light, cheap fighter.

Three of them “flying wing” on an F-15.


23 posted on 02/25/2021 4:23:27 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith

If you had an updated 4th Gen Fighter like the F-16 the inflation adjusted dollars would be in the ballpark of the F-35.

Another reason that the F-35’s number is larger is that the USAF changed their accounting methods. It’s a cost-of-ownership number based on the spares, fuel and so forth. It’s not just the plane youre looking at.


32 posted on 02/25/2021 4:34:21 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith

I entirely agree. The military & contractors can’t deliver adequate big-ticket items anymore.


86 posted on 02/25/2021 6:23:27 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson