Posted on 02/18/2021 3:17:30 PM PST by Rocco DiPippo
Ordinary vaccines we have lots of experience with, such as measles, the flu shot, mumps and similar do not carry a risk beyond that of natural infection and cannot be weaponized because they produce the exact same antibody response as a natural infection. If you have had either the measles or the shot you will have antibodies but an antibody test will not tell you which since they're not distinguishable.
I suspected from the start that due to the way these mRNA shots work -- they are not actually a vaccine at all in that they do not "mimic" natural infection but rather cause your cells to produce the spike protein that the virus has and that elicits an immune response -- that the antibodies produced by those jabs would be distinct and distinguishable from natural infection.
All of the so-called "experts" who worked to develop these and the firms involved knew damn well this was the case when they started developing them -- and did it anyway.
Now we have hard, scientific confirmation of that and it's very bad.
In fact it's potentially nation-ending bad.
An adversary that develops a virus (e.g. another modified/mutated bat virus, for example) that selectively targets ADE in people with the specific antibodies from vaccination, which are distinct from natural infection, could easily kill every single person who was vaccinated and not harm or only make mildly sick those who either had Covid-19 naturally or who were uninfected and unvaccinated.
(Excerpt) Read more at market-ticker.org ...
Don’t know about that particular aspect of it, but Denninger has a demonstrated knowledge of a lot of stuff.
A visit to that website is a wrist-slitting good time. Geez.
I believe the author is an “economics and markets guy”.
I have a background in biology and have done a lot of research and it concerns me that many health care professionals have reservations about the mRNA vaccines. With that being said, there is probably a general consensus that the vaccines are good among that crowd, but that does not make me feel better and some of the skeptics have legitimate questions.
I don’t presume to tell others what to do and believe everyone should make up their own mind about them and conduct their own health risks assessment.
I am at low risk for the virus and have opted after lots of reading (about half foreign media sources - I have little trust in American media) to wait for the Johnson and Johnson traditional vaccine.
On the other hand, my parents have both gotten the mRNA vaccine and I am thankful because they are much higher risks than I.
I WILL NOT allow my teenage children to be vaccinated nor do they need to be. It is simply not justified given what their outlook would be if they contracted the virus. I do believe there are very legitimate questions and concerns for how these vaccines might impact a pregnancy for women. What is the rush for kids? We will know much more about the vaccine in months or years if it is still a “pandemic”.
Hope this makes sense and your mileage may vary. I don’t think there is any “right” answer at the moment. However, like all things Covid, it mostly depends on your age and health condition. The one-size fits all approach is definitely not warranted for our kids.
There’s stuff like this since about May of 2020.
From what I’ve gathered by reading such information is this is not a vaccine at all, rather a genetic modifier where the end results are not clearly understood due to the lack of long term testing meds normally get.
I also understand that there is no vaccine for any covid type disease, case in point the common cold. That’s why they went a route that is not of the common vaccine.
And I also believe even some government people are saying after these shots you still need to wear the mask, you can still transmit the disease, and you can still get the disease. Other sites say there are some nasty side effects.
I am not of the medical profession, thus I really do not know what to believe. Maybe this is an engineered bio weapon, maybe not. Maybe this “vaccine” will work, maybe not.
Considering the survival rate when actually getting the China Flu is well over 99%, it’s best wait this out a little until we see just what happens to those actually getting the shots.
The Risks of Rushing a COVID-19 Vaccine
My take on this whole sad affair is you don't buy version 1 of anything. Not software, certainly not an experimental vaccine.
Individual mileage can and will vary.
He’s an idiot. The mRNA vaccines do “mimic” natural infection.
All viruses infect you by hijacking your cells and forcing them to make more virus, which then infect more cells. Eventually, your immune system recognizes the invasion of the cell snatchers and starts to kill them off.
Traditional vaccines use killed or weaken virus to elicit the immune response. They take longer to make because the virus has to be cultured in sufficient amounts and then killed/weakened to make vaccines. Bad batches of vaccine with insufficiently killed or weakened virus have been known to cause disease outbreaks.
The mRNA vaccine is using messenger RNA to reprogram your body cells exactly like a virus would only it’s programmed to only replicate a single viral protein to elicit the immune reaction. Since there is no actual full virus present, it can’t cause the disease itself. Because it is synthesized rather than cultured, no human fetal or animal cell lines are used in its manufacture and it takes much less time to manufacture.
The fact is, this is the first time mRNA tech has been used in a human vaccine, and it was rushed into use without the usual years-long testing. I won't take it nor will any of my loved ones. Hell, I won't take the Johnson and Johnson conventional one either since I've had nothing but bad reactions to just about every vaccine I've had during the past 20 years or so.
If this disease was Ebola, or something like it, perhaps I'd roll the dice and take the jab. But it's not. I'll take Zinc, Ivermectin and high dose Vitamin D if I experience the onset of Covid and leave the rest up to God.
the Johnson and Johnson traditional vaccine is said to be out in March
There are several immunologists who are concerned that the protein spike manufactured is similar or almost identical to one that is essential to women's fertility. In other words, they believe there is potential for this vaccine to cause infertility in women, which might be permanent.
Long term controlled studies on the long term effects of these mRNA vaccines have not been done. Given the fact that Covid has a very high survival rate that is frightening to me - it reeks of recklessness and desperation.
Bkmk
The J&J vaccine is the only one I’ll ever have.
But nobody is offering it.
COVID vaccine bump for later...
That is a theory without evidence. And they are looking for that evidence. Multiple women in the first trials became pregnant during the study frame time and to date have had no issues.
Global warming is a theory also.
FYI: J&J uses an aborted fetus cell line PER.C6 a retinal cell line that was isolated from a terminated fetus in 1985 to produce and manufacture its covid vaccine.
Viruses do not target and attack antibodies, they hide from them. So he has the science exactly backward. It would be a great feat of science to engineer a virus that commits seppuku by attacking antibodies and thereby alerting the immune system to its presence immediately rather than hiding and replicating madly in order to survive.
Then he blathers on about ADE while the linked article is about MIS which are not the same things.
The author is indeed an “economics and markets guy”. Also founded the first or one of the first ISPs in the Chicago area and sold it, making himself independently wealthy.
I do know that when the 737 Max/MCAS “brown blizzard” hit, he also wrote at length on that. I’m actually in that industry myself, and what he wrote was generally consistent with the conclusions we at work came to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.