No doubt that an insurrection attempt took place. Also no doubt it was NOT attempted under the authority and direction of the President.
A jury member must vote to AQUIT an accused if the prosecution fails to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Having listened to the Case presented without witnesses to support the accusation...
Anyone who votes to convict Donald Trump of Incitement to insurrection should be removed from office. -— looks like they are wrapping this up by unanimous consent they agreed to present their closing arguments and avoid the whole witness calling debacle ——
Might have been interesting to see Pelosi testify
Obama was awol on the night of Benghazi. They arrested a film producer that had nothing to do with the “peaceful protest.”
Hillarys deposition was not recorded. She orders blackberries destroyed and “wipes the hard drive with a cloth.” A U.S. Ambassadore is sodomized and killed. Rice lies to the American public the following morning.
Result: not one is held accountable
Trump calls for peaceful protest
Result: rinos join dems and calls for Trumps head.
(Cathy Griffin takes the request at face value)
I want my country back MAGA
You are thinking about a court of LAW. This is a political court, a kangaroo court, a Stalinist show trial, not a court of law. No court of law would be conducted like the House Managers have done so far.
“A jury member must vote to AQUIT an accused if the prosecution fails to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.”
That’s in the real world, in a real court of law. This isn’t either of those things.
Bookmarked 57/43