Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patriot torch

Another pointless smear.

However, as stated, Pfizer and Moderna were each tested in Clinical trials Phases 1 - 3 on over 100,000 volunteer subjects per each vaccine and demonstrated 94% and 95% efficacy in preventing disease and 100% efficacy in preventing severe disease and death.

In Tuskagee, the airmen where not informed of what was occurring which is clear breach of informed consent. So if you choose to draw an equivalency, kindly make sure that the equivalency is valid.

So, I ask you, are you intentionally bringing up untrue comparisons because of the malignant need to be right, or the sadistic need to control the lives of other and prevent them from choosing studied and proven life saving vaccines?

Please answer directly, if you are capable of doing so.


69 posted on 02/10/2021 6:54:46 PM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

“However, as stated, Pfizer and Moderna were each tested in Clinical trials Phases 1 - 3 on over 100,000 volunteer subjects per each vaccine and demonstrated 94% and 95% efficacy in preventing disease and 100% efficacy in preventing severe disease and death.”

Now where have I heard such proponents for unapproved big pharma? I know, it was the last big pharma lobbiest I spoke with.

“In Tuskagee, the airmen where not informed of what was occurring which is clear breach of informed consent. So if you choose to draw an equivalency, kindly make sure that the equivalency is valid.”

Tuskegee Airmen were used as guinni pigs for experimentation purposes. Connect the dots. Even you can do that.

“So, I ask you, are you intentionally bringing up untrue comparisons because of the malignant need to be right, or the sadistic need to control the lives of other and prevent them from choosing studied and proven life saving vaccines?”

I’m not the one promoting vaccines that lack fda approval and receive a lot of $ for a product they are granted full immunity from liability. Perhaps that’s the type of informed consent you were implying? Heres a hint, you can cite all the statistics you want but when major testing phases are bypassed (unprecedented btw) then its lacking confidence for the consumer.

“Please answer directly, if you are capable of doing so.”

Theres my direct response. Enjoy


80 posted on 02/10/2021 7:06:01 PM PST by patriot torch (Ashlie Babbitt-say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson