When people start talking “another party”...
The concept of needing one party from which to work in this day and age may be obsolete; modern, lateral-horizontal communications are the future. That prospect terrifies the Deep State.
No ONE political party can solve all of our problems. The future is of horizontal-lateral communications and of the new forms control that emerge from such freedom of association; these are “robust” systems-difficult to contaminate and corrupt.
NCSWIC
If there are enough of “us” -independent, motivated, doing our own research, creating our own communications and media, organizing for clean elections in our local precincts, counties and states, no specific party affiliation or even heroic “strong man leader” is necessary.
The only people for whom party affiliation is important is “them” -and thats because WITHOUT a central organization “them” can focus on, manipulate and obtain control over, ...”them” can do nothing....about what is coming.
NCSWIC-nothing can stop what is coming.
This probability terrifies the DeepState , which is why they are doubling-down on 20th century control mechanisms-which ultimately are futile. This is the Time Magazine story.
“Them” wants “Us” paralyzed by buying into the last century’s political paradigms.It is their only remaining real control mechanism.
NCSWIC
think about that every day every night 24/7/365
That’s what I think about all of this third party talk. In the sense of forming an organization to pursue an ideal, like the Tea Party, it’s fine - but there is no need for a new, bloated bureaucracy full of timid functionaries. Conservatives need to see the use of a party label as tactical, the way collectivists do. There are plenty of outright Communists calling themselves “Democrats” - so nothing is wrong with a patriot calling himself a “Republican” if it helps win an election. It doesn’t mean swearing allegiance to Lindsay Graham, it’s just using an existing structure - the way Trump did - to attain public office in a way that would be difficult to do without that structure.
The harmful belief has been that RINOs who win primary elections (perhaps with electronic assistance) must subsequently receive unequivocal support from the base in general elections, because Democrats are so horrible. We have seen now that those RINOs are often nothing but politically ambitious narcissistic sociopaths who adopt the Republican label for the reasons mentioned above.
No need whatsoever to support the Romneys and Murkowskis in any election - support only those who share patriotic beliefs and Constitutional ideals. In some rare cases, those people might even have a (D) after their names - because that is what is required tactically to win. In any case, no contributions should ever be made to parties - only to individual candidates.