“As secretary, she would likely have seen documents indicating that Jews were being killed in the camp. She’s an accessory to atrocities and needs to pay.”
I must disagree. The standard you imply suggests anyone with knowledge of a Jew being murdered should pay. As someone else on this thread mentioned, Hiter’s personal secretary was never charged, she certainly knew what was going on.
Those with knowledge of mass murder that never had any level of physical participation in it could be in the thousands that are still alive. You expect the child of a concentration camp that had knowledge of dad’s activities to be rounded up and tried? Or take the lady in question, just what was she supposed to do as a kid secretary, shoot her boss, turn him in to the Gestapo?
If knowledge of a single murder makes one an accessory, why do you think that knowledge of ten thousand murders doesn’t?