Posted on 02/06/2021 1:29:14 PM PST by Art-Diver
Over at the White House, the press secretary appeared to make fun of the Space Forceâa new, legitimate branch of the U.S. military.
Which makes this a great time to ask the question: what exactly is its purpose?
The way things are going, it’s primary purpose should be to nuke D.C. from orbit. Maybe they could invent a probe like Nomad. “Sterilize!”
Wasn’t Trump accused of treason when he said something unkind about the FBI or the CIA? Not sure which.
In military terms, whomever controls the high ground as a significant advantage over those that do not.
China and Russia and others are militarizing space. If we don’t get involved in this, they will have the high ground and all the advantages with it.
Tungsten rods are cheap and reusable, when compared to nukes, and they have the same capacity from space to do damage on par of nuclear hardware. Once used, the rods just need to be reforged in order to be re-used.
That’s what I’m aware of.
Space as it pertains to outer and inner? Above earth space and cyber space security?
^
China is rapidly gaining ground in space communications and is deploying their own GPS satellites that use different time encoding than the existing system. They have also demonstrated the most sophisticated ASAT (anti-satellite) weaponry of any nation although it left debris in space that is threatening the ISS and other US assets everyday.
Once all their planned systems are in place they will have the capability to disrupt the US GPS systems, disable communication satellites used by the Navy, and render our ability to rapidly respond to a Taiwan invasion ineffective.
The reason Jen Psaki makes fun of this is because they are in on the plan. It will provide an excuse for our inability to save Taiwan by blaming Trump for an ineffective space defense. Once you understand which side they are on it all makes sense.
I believe that you are correct, because of the tenets of globalism is not just supremacy of a single power, but a few countries having the same approximate influence on world affairs as a counter-balance to each other.
For that to happen, the influence of the US must be reduced to match China and Russia and Europe’s level.
They hate anything Trump did and are willing to make members of the force uncomfortable to express their hatred.
>>>I believe that you are correct, because of the tenets of globalism is not just supremacy of a single power, but a few countries having the same approximate influence on world affairs as a counter-balance to each other.
In what world of globalists is THAT???
The globalists that Walter Cronkite supported for over 60 years wanted a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oFS-KT377M
It is still a one world government,but it is how the world will be managed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.