Replies

Your rage and calling people murderers is frankly disgusting. What therapeutics.
HCQ does little to help in disease. I thinks an ok prophylaxis though imperfect

As I have been saying for three weeks there is a therapeutic thst works. But you insist on weak therapeutics that are imperfect

If you want to do good on the therapeutic side... anyone who is over 66 or has comorbidities and tests positive with symptoms should without delay have 700 mg of Bamlanivimab IV. It is administered at an infusion center outpatient. It is ineffective after severe disease.

I have personally seen it turn around moderate disease heading for disaster in 24-36 hours. This is like regeneron. It is targeted exactly at the virus and works well

Continuing to promote weak therapeutics makes you the person with blood on your hands. Continuing to paint vaccines as dangerous leaves you in the side or wanting people to be ill.

And before you start your usual nonsense of attacking my faith and attacking the science of the 24 M people vaccinated I am certain that if there were going to be death upon reexposure to Covid we would see the bodies piling up.

They are not
These are the facts
They are not in dispute.

I am certain that if there were going to be death upon reexposure to Covid we would see the bodies piling up.

A few years of watching for this before taking any vaccine would be good. That said, Gates and co. are already prophetically predicting the next one that will be 10x worse. The thief steal in daylight, he must find an opening or encourage the homeowner to not lock his doors. The Malthusian can’t outright kill his victims, so he must get them to do something to reduce their Fecundity and longevity

“Bamlanivimab”

Let me attest to the life saving benefit of the Eli Lily version of Regeneron. 4 weeks ago, a loved one of mine was administered it at the close of the window when it is labeled effective. His life was saved and his blood work and vitals turned around within the hour!

If your elder loved one is positive, fight with everything you've got to get the monoclonal antibody infusion. It is THE star of this tragic episode, a miracle drug.

My question du jour is whether it is scientifically possible for someone who tests negative after the illness and tests positive for antibodies could still be infectious? In all my long life, I have never known of a person considered to be infectious after having a virus? It sounds preposterous in theory but the CDC "still does not know" so I'm asking your medical opinion, doc?