RE: You don’t dispute that the vaccine is far more effective than a HCL cocktail do you?
I DON’T YET KNOW. The data is too early and the suppression of HCQ too prevalent to make a comparison.
I am NOT against vaccines, but we need time to evaluate.
RE: Do you dispute that it’s far better to avoid the infection (ie, vaccine) than to treat the infection later (HCL)?
Avoid the infection? You have a 5% of being infected and a Congressman, Stephen Lynch who received the complete 2 does Pfizer vaccine tested positive anyway. See here:
RE: I have provided some information that disputes what the AFLD have stated. Here is some additional information from sources far more credible than AFLD:
Good, the more information, the better. So, do you disagree with the Big Tech and other social media censoring their presentation and only allowing one side to be aired? Or do you applaud what the big techs are doing?
I don’t agree with what they’re doing. The more information out there ( good or bad), the better. Let the public evaluate them for themselves.
RE: The anti-vaxxer propaganda is very clever. Like you, they make statement like ‘we only want you to understand the risks’ while they do all they can to undermine public confidence in the vaccines.
‘Like you?’ Did I ever write anything that is against vaccination? Did I ever UNDERMINE ( emphasis ) vaccines?
But yes, I want people to understand the possible risks.
RE: How many will die because the believe this propaganda.
Same question I ask - how many will die and have died because the doctors were not allowed to prescribe the HCQ or Ivermectin protocols that they OBSERVED have saved their patients when they were administered?
If you see my posts you should know by now that I am for an EVERYTHING THAT HAS EVIDENCE APPROACH.
If you are going to fight against the enemy, you use every weapon at your disposal. If you are going to argue about the effectivity of one weapon vs. the other, you argue OUT IN THE OPEN, not forcibly suppress one in favor of the other.
SeekAndFind wrote: “I am NOT against vaccines, but we need time to evaluate.”
So, how many will die while we’re waiting?
Avoid the infection? You have a 5% of being infected and a Congressman, Stephen Lynch who received the complete 2 does Pfizer vaccine tested positive anyway.”
The vaccines have a 95% effectiveness which is more than sufficient to achieve herd immunity and that, once achieved, is pretty much the end of the virus. Meanwhile, those that rely upon HCL have no long lasting protection.
SeekAndFind wrote: “I don’t agree with what they’re doing. The more information out there ( good or bad), the better. Let the public evaluate them for themselves.’
Sounds very fair but AFLD are very biased in their selection and presentation of the facts. I would believe the links I provided are a much better source of information than these
Here’s some more background on these ‘doctors’:
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90533
Turns out their experience with CV19 is rather limited.
SeekAndFind wrote: “‘Like you?’ Did I ever write anything that is against vaccination? Did I ever UNDERMINE ( emphasis ) vaccines?”
Only when you post articles like this one.
SeekAndFind wrote: “Same question I ask - how many will die and have died because the doctors were not allowed to prescribe the HCQ or Ivermectin protocols that they OBSERVED have saved their patients when they were administered?”
Let’s see, HCL might be 25% effective and the vaccine has been proven to be 95% effective. Which do you think will save more lives?