To: reasonisfaith
I made an error. Should read “the most powerful alternative, on academic grounds, to evolution.” 1) There is no alternative to the theory of evolution that can be validated in a rigorous scientific manner.
2) I am not going to waste time with this. I already know that people who are anti-science are impervious to evidence and facts, and that is something I cannot change.
51 posted on
02/08/2021 8:44:07 AM PST by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
To: exDemMom; reasonisfaith
I regard DNA as intelligent design.
To: exDemMom
You mean evolutionists who believe scientific impossibilities like speciation, and who are unable to understand that a randomly disrupted digital code causes breakdown of the entire system?
56 posted on
02/08/2021 4:56:07 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson