Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LSUfan

The navy strike load and range has continually dropped since Vietnam. Ending the A-6 was a Cheney idea even though large numbers of them were brand new. The F-14d was a great load carrier with legs and speed. It was routinely launching from the Indian Ocean from beyond silkworm range, and doing strike missions with a good load over Afghanistan! We got rid of that beast and the A-6 tankers so those days are over. We went to an all 18 force but then decided to shrink things even more with the F-35 moonpig.
The carrier strike force has never had such a short range, or carried such a small load.
Oh well, I suppose it’s a total force concept where they bland in well with destroyers that cannot outmaneuver a container ship.


4 posted on 01/31/2021 8:06:48 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

I wasted in an A-6 squadron in the navy. The A-6 was the best medium attack aircraft ever. Going to the F/A 18 was a huge mistake.


5 posted on 01/31/2021 8:14:49 AM PST by dis.kevin (Dry white toast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

“The carrier strike force has never had such a short range, or carried such a small load.”

Sure they did, but you’d have to go back to the 1920’s and 1930’s when naval aviation was still in its infancy.


13 posted on 01/31/2021 12:37:38 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (One Nation, Under Fraud Completely Visible, With Spying and Lying Too All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson