Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fhayek

The $300 price for a $10 stock also lures in new shorts. So who is going to blink first? The shorter who has to cover and pay a premium fee or the Retards who buy the stock for $300 and never have to sell? The cost of holding an open short is expensive and unlimited risk. The cost of holding a $300 stock is at most -$300. Not selling drives up the price when the short has to cover. Collectively, the Retards can’t lose.


81 posted on 01/29/2021 5:57:46 PM PST by Justa (If where you came from is so great then why aren't Floridians moving there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Justa
Well, I suppose that buying a stock for $300 and selling for $10 is losing. But that loss is limited.

But the REAL value is for me, who can watch this train wreck from the sidelines with no skin in the game - and laugh my ass off. Funnier than Benny Hill, it is...

82 posted on 01/29/2021 6:03:45 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: Justa

“Collectively, the Retards can’t lose”

I knew someday, my superpower would prevail.


84 posted on 01/29/2021 6:09:21 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson