Replies

Unfortunately, most republicans and conservatives work for a living and despite their desire, relatively few would be able to attend. No so for the Democrats, many who work for NGOs and those living off trust funds would be there in abundance. In the end whatever document they produce would be filled with inanities and resemble the Russian Constitution which can be amended at will by the legislature.

They wouldn't need to be great in number, just ordinary people who understand the present system in sham and fraud. They could be retired folks. I think the focus needs to be on election integrity and transparency. We should reach out to the Bernie Bros with a simple argument: "You know the Dems rigged the primaries, and we know they rigged the general election. Let's work together and fix this." It could work if the focus is limited to that issue. If people think they can force all kinds of amendments that don't have broad support, it won't work. Four more state legislatures (38) would need to approve an amendment than are needed to call the convention (34). This can't get crazy.

As for Jena - there were only two lawyers that reported directly to DJT, Rudi and Jena. Byrne says Rudi and the Mediocrity met with DJT - leaving no doubt as to the identity of the Mediocrity.

It may be that Jena only lasted six months as a prosecutor because she had ethical problems with a criminal justice system where everyone is guilty, only the worst criminals ever see a jury, and doesn't function as intended. It may well be that she was the best lawyer for the job, because so many others wouldn't take the case. People miss the fact that Trump's case wasn't popular and law firms didn't want to touch the case, some did quit. Getting lawyers to do what the client wants can be very difficult. They have their own ideas about what they will do, and frequently won't do the client's bidding.

At this point and given my 25 years unsuccessfully battling these people from Federal court to SCOTUS, from high level meetings to the written word, from personal involvement to group involvement, I’m leaning to drastic

I've been at it longer than you, and yes I well know the way to SCOTUS. Fundamentally, our governing elite doesn't get it. There are still a few peaceful options remaining and we need to exhaust them. An economic boycott can make a statement, even if CJ Roberts thinks we can be taxed on money we don't spend.

I’ve been at it longer than you, and yes I well know the way to SCOTUS. Fundamentally, our governing elite doesn’t get it. There are still a few peaceful options remaining and we need to exhaust them. An economic boycott can make a statement, even if CJ Roberts thinks we can be taxed on money we don’t spend.
—
Our governing elite does get it - its the public that doesn’t get it.

Those 25 plus years were from really 1972-2003. After that time it was apparent, all peaceful options having been exhausted, there was no viable non-drastic solution.

Get back to me when: your case in front of SCOTUS is fundamentally altered on the spot before you can argue your case and has just been rendered moot;
when you are declared legally the wrong race to practice your profession; when you are told others have superior rights and are your masters, to whom you must submit; you have been served by federal marshals; when lower courts knowingly over-rule SCOTUS without repercussions; been sent to federal prison for the crime of (whatever your profession may be); had co-workers murdered and maimed for life; had .50 locked and loaded M2’s aim at you by nervous 19 year old soldiers; when your home and work place are firebombed; when you receive death treats and are called vile names in the newspapers and from church pulpits and; because of all of that, lose your wife, children and home.

Let me know how it goes for you. Because that. and worse. is what’s coming. down the pike. for you and yours.