Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

dirty ‘judge’ Roberts should be on TRIAL, NOW.

ObamaCARE: he lied and forced TAXES on Americans illegally
for his beloved Malta and Vatican.

POTUS: he hates GEOTUS. HATES. even got caught saying it.

Epstein Island, Ireland, Taken Children, Raped Children,
Murdered Children: very bad. very very bad.
He brings a whole NEW Atrocity to SCOTUS. Disgusting.

2020 Election: Belongs in HELL but wants his pension anyway
after his TREASON and SEDITION. No wonder he is HIDING.


2 posted on 01/26/2021 8:37:15 AM PST by Diogenesis ("when a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Diogenesis

I can no longer say aloud what I feel towards this person, nor what I think should be done with him.


3 posted on 01/26/2021 8:38:49 AM PST by rlmorel ("I’d rather enjoy a risky freedom than a safe servitude." Robby Dinero, USMC Veteran, Gym Owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Diogenesis

So Congress can just impeach a private citizen and serve as judge and jury? The Constitution is clear you can impeach a President, but Trump isn’t President so what in the heck are they doing. If Trump supposedly committed a crime of inciting violence then that is something for DOJ and the courts not Congress. This impeachment is a joke and is just a private vendetta.


32 posted on 01/26/2021 10:35:39 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Diogenesis
Ahem. Do you see the problem here, you strict constructionists, you living constitutionalists, and you, Sen. Chuck E. Schumer (D-NY)? When the proposed trial begins on February 8, Roberts, CJ, can say -- should say -- to the assembled duly sworn multitude: “Sorry chaps. The President of the United States is not on trial. Citizen Trump is on trial. So it would be against the Constitution as written for the Chief Justice to preside. And it would be a grievous blow to the dignity of the Supreme Court and the plain meaning of the Constitution if the Chief Justice were to preside in flagrant violation of the plain words of the Constitution.”



33 posted on 01/26/2021 10:44:28 AM PST by knarf (The Constitution protects the right to peaceably assemble, not to protest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson