Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fruser1

The courts who refused to hear the cases are participants in the fraud.


11 posted on 01/24/2021 8:40:11 AM PST by motor_racer (Who will bell the cat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: motor_racer

The courts who refused to hear the cases are participants in the fraud.


Agree.

But.....who will try these courts?


14 posted on 01/24/2021 8:42:36 AM PST by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation πŸ™πŸ»πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: motor_racer

Most Judges these days seem to have morphed into Kangaroos.


15 posted on 01/24/2021 8:42:54 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: motor_racer
he courts who refused to hear the cases are participants in the fraud.

Not necessarily. Election law in the states is a political process involving the US Constitution, and has to be approved by Congress before a state can hold federal elections. And when there is a dispute over election fraud, it is between the states' Legislatures and Congress to fix it. Not the courts. Not the governors. And the courts are limited to determining whether an election was UNLAWFUL for failing to follow the state election laws.

22 posted on 01/24/2021 8:52:55 AM PST by RideForever (We are born to be tested ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson