To: caseinpoint
You would be correct. Mark Levin yesterday said Kamala Harris would be the one to preside over the case.
To: White Lives Matter; caseinpoint
The Vice-President does not preside in the impeachment trial of the President because of the conflict of interest in presiding over the means of becoming President themselves.
In the case of Trump, we would have the same conflict of interest in Kamala Harris presiding over the banning of her potential 2024 rival from running.
This would open up huge constitutional issues of parties impeaching their most popular campaign rivals just to prevent them from running.
-PJ
40 posted on
01/23/2021 10:38:45 PM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: White Lives Matter; caseinpoint; conservative98
“Mark Levin yesterday said Kamala Harris would be the one to preside over the case.”
That would make it even more partisan, which means that likelihood of conviction will be near zero. Even Delecto may vote against conviction.
70 posted on
01/23/2021 11:58:07 PM PST by
aquila48
(Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson