Interesting case going on in Atlantic county NJ right now - before election, county clerk sent out ballots which in one area accidentally omitted the names for one councilman race; about 300 voters received the defective ballots - in the race overall the ‘rat won (of course, it’s NJ after all) but since her margin was only about 250 votes, a local judge ruled that the election was invalid because more than the number of voters which could have swung the election the other way were disenfranchised because of the defective ballots - he called for a new election for the entire area - those seeking to confirm Trump’s victory have got to figure out ways to get around the courts’ bizarre claims that they’ve filed too late, or too soon, or for people who don’t have standing - all those dodges which to date have prevented the public from seeing the totality of the evidence of massive fraud in the election - the answer is out there to make the truth known......
Interesting. So the game plan could be, identify key areas where the margin of error is greater than the margin of the RAT win; and definitive evidence of defective ballots already exists.
For good measure, I’d even look at areas where the margin of error was small but the RATs lost by a tiny margin. Because there are places where the RATs might have attempted a steal, and failed by a hair’s breadth. After all, the “plausible deniability” counterargument will be that conservatives are cherry-picking the places where Trump lost because we’re just butt-hurt. If we can prove Trump won despite fraud, we’re not acting out of butt-hurt, we’re pointing to an even bigger problem.
I might be alone here in thinking half of the country isn’t strongly conservative AND pro-Trump, but isn’t that sold on the RATs either. A hell of a lot of people in that group would be far more amenable to us getting a fair hearing if our arguments were
1. many voting systems across the USA are now completely out of date, FUBAR, and wide open to manipulation.
2. political parties are now little more than extremely divisive front-of-house brands for lobbies, corporate voices and foreign interests (as Washington warned they would eventually end up being) so the PARTIES no longer represent the American people directly.
At the moment (2) is a challenge if we approach it like QAnon. Of course politicians represent Wall Street, foreign oligarchies, the industrial military complex, offshore labor, unaccountable NGOs, artificial enterprises like the European Union, and lobbies ranging from the NRA (which we like) to the Climate Change lobby (which we don’t) ahead of “we the people” but it’s been that way for so long that it’s been normalised.
You need to prove (1) before you can deconstruct the perception that (2) is normal.