Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yardstick

“I just read the WHO revised guidance and I don’t see where they directly mention a reduction in the cycle count.“

They say to go with the way pcr was meant to be used. Which means diagnostic only and a replication rate around 20. In the 40’s during Trump time.

So you are technically correct, they do not say to reduce but they do say to use manufacturers methods which is never above 20 iirc.


23 posted on 01/21/2021 3:24:10 PM PST by walkingdead (We are sacrificing American youth's future on the altar of our own fear. And it is a travesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: walkingdead

Okay, and along those lines I see the article links to a tweet where the WHO does directly talk about false positives from a high cycle count. Interestingly the tweet has been deleted.


27 posted on 01/21/2021 3:42:12 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson