Posing or association with the Proud Boys isn’t against the law or prejudicial to his case.
He still has 1st and 4th amendment protections, and if the prosecution made this part of their plan, I’d be prepared to jump them and shove it straight up their backsides with FACTS.
This has nothing to do with the 1st or 4th Amendment.
He would have a 1st Amendment right to go on television and read a statement saying he shot that person with criminal intent, and that it was premeditated. He could also confess to any other number of crimes, under the 1st Amendment.
So he had the right to do it, but that doesn't meat it would help his legal issues. So, this has nothing to do with his rights.
LOL. I never said it was illegal. I asked why he doesn't have a lawyer looking out for his best interests.
Any lawyer worth his salt would make sure this kid did not appear or speak in public, except in a possible tightly controlled was by the lawyer. But probably not even that.
Apparently you aren't familiar with the U.S. legal system. Because anything you say can be used against you. Anything you do on video, could be used against you.
Any reasonable lawyer would not have his client seen celebrating in a bar while out on bail, let alone one who is a 17-year-old child.
Among other reasons, a potential juror could see this, and rightly or wrongly, that could carry into their jury service. Find me one criminal lawyer who would say that allowing this child to do this was a good idea?
Look, so-called “Proud Boys” are leftwing, idiot, mother’s basement dwelling users. Yes, leftwing, and used to promote the leftwing. They are named after their theme song, which is an LGBT Disney song. ‘nuff said.
In actually, the PBs have beliefs on Jews that are basically what the far left believes.