You’re incredibly naive...sorry. You’re basically stating that the government doing an audit of the equipment they decided to buy, knowing what could be done, is, somehow, trustworthy.
I am a software expert - I’m not going to argue with you, these machines are not secure. It isn’t debatable - all you need to understand is their architecture.
I am a software expert with over 30 years experience.
You are right. There is no debating with someone who responded as quickly as you did, because it's obvious you did not read the audit at all. It's also futile debating with someone who when presented with the evidence they requested immediately moves the goal posts to state that whoever audited it is also in on the "big conspiracy".