Every version/release of election software code is deposited in escrow to a third party, and it has been and may be audited again by anyone authorized to do so. Dominion doesn't fear discovery because the code has been audited by many States and I believe by an agency in the Federal govt.
Goose step, goose step to Biden’s Banana Republic!
Provide me the evidence of that claim.
Why did Dominion refuse to allow forensic examination of their machines and cited the private and proprietary nature of their software IN COURT????
Yes, people have tried to examine and hack them - with success, which is why many State’s refused to use them. I have seen nor read anything about SOURCE CODE (not binary executables) being made available for line-by-line examination. If that had happened there would be zero questions about whether they connect to networks (wireless or not).
Second, the tabulation machines are one thing. Then there’s the PC’s they get to download to and then the servers they connect to. This system is a cybersecurity nightmare. There is ZERO reason to believe in its integrity. It’s practically convoluted by design. That the operator can ‘decide’ what a vote is and move votes around is an abomination.
FYI...I’m a software architect. I have spoken at conferences on cybersecurity. This thing isn’t just a problem, it is designed to enable fraud.
That you’re defending this ‘product’ and the conduct shown by the owners is disturbing. I’ve followed this for months, I’ve seen ‘altered data’ feeds. There is no question that thousands of votes were switched. I have the data files on my PC.
As software EXPERT I have zero confidence in the integrity of our elections using such systems. I have seen NOTHING to indicate that the SOURCE CODE has been examined by 3rd parties. They have patents they claim to be protecting. I have no idea where you’re getting your information but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence...especially considering whom owns the company and the business & political relationships surrounding it.
Please provide specifics. I’m fine with being wrong but I’ve seen nothing to back up your claim.