“The congresswoman said she believes she was upholding the Constitution in her electoral objections despite no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the presidential election.”
This is, of course, a straw man argument coming from the gaslight media, because whether “widespread fraud” occurred or not, it wouldn’t have any bearing on whether she thought local fraud had happened to an extent to justify her objection to the certification.
Use of vicious logical fallacies in the news media is one of the tells of gaslighting, as is done here.
Why are you even trying to parse that? To do so just plays into the hands of those trying to brainwash people to think that simply believing that there was vote fraud should now be a career-ending “offense.” This is ludicrous. The Left is trying to hide its fraud operation and demonize its opponents by making “fraud” the new “n word” (or “f word”).