Posted on 01/12/2021 12:10:43 AM PST by knighthawk
In an editorial published by the Washington Post on Monday entitled, “Trump should be impeached. But that alone won’t remove white supremacy from America,” failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton described last Wednesday’s “attack on the Capitol” as a function of “white-supremacist grievances fueled by Donald Trump.”
Clinton repeated the false claim that President Donald Trump praised neo-Nazis as “very fine people” following the 2017 riots in Charlottesville VA. She framed “whiteness” — a term she did not define — as the president’s political priority. Clinton wrote:
Trump ran for president on a vision of America where whiteness is valued at the expense of everything else. In the White House, he gave white supremacists, members of the extreme right and conspiracy theorists their most powerful platforms yet, even claiming that there were “very fine people” among the torch-wielding militia members who converged on Charlottesville in 2017.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Be a shame if someone mistook ButHerEmails for a baby Harp seal...
Says the quintessential white woman herself...
the ghoul is preparing our gulags.
but the frog is out of the pot!
Translation: Whatever we do, it will never be enough! The Revolution is unending!
Regards,
Orval Faubus was a invited guest once at a Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham function.
She gives all harridans a bad name.
And so, her silence ended just like that...
Now she’s out to stir the pot a bit.
Some like to never let a crisis go to waste.
Hillary was always a harpy an a harridan. But despite her best efforts, she was not the worst Democrat candidate of all time. Creepy Uncle Beijing Biden, Hunter’s bribe taker and crack packer earns that accolade. To pretend that Joe Biden actually won the election, is to test the limits of the absurd.
"Forget about it Hillary. Your party just committed voter fraud in order to elect a racist, and segregationist to the White House."
The second comment I posted was to someone who was asking if other people's comments were being put on hold pending review. This is my response to him:
"Yep. Perhaps Breitbart is being threatened by whoever is holding their servers hostage.
Four hours, and they still haven't been released to the comment section. What BS.
What she means is white MALE supremacy
Never been a woman borne who wishes so bad as to have had a bone attached to her frontside where the peehole and Carlsbad gulch lay instead
She doesn’t think she’s white. Don’t you remember that she’s married to “The First Black President”?
In Cankles' case, it is an opportunity to try and stay relevant, long past her time
If she wants to remove white supremacy from the US, she can go first.
Haman hangs on his own gallows
From the woman who used a black woman, Donna Brazile, as her house slave to do her dirty work for her. And her husband used a black man, Vernon Jordan, to hook Monica Lewinsky up with a job in the private sector.
But have you considered the possibility that online SJW's are spamming their site with the worst racist / violent / misogynist comments imaginable, in order to direct the attention of Breitbart's server hosting company to these "typical Breitbart comments" and demand that they be de-platformed?
If that's true, then Breitbart would be wise to suspend ALL comments from being posted until moderators can review each & every one to weed out the incendiary ones. In which case, don't hold your breath to see your comments posted any time soon. Unlike FB & Twitter, they likely can't afford to use extremely expensive & sophisticated custom-tailored robots that pick up the lion's share of the comments they don't want to see, and instead rely on a limited number of humans to laboriously plow thru each one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
