It was a bad shoot. She posed no threat to anyone. She was displaying a weapon, she wasn’t charging the officer, she wasn’t physically intimidating.
Say her name - Ashli Babbitt.
“She was displaying a weapon,”
The victim was displaying a weapon? If that is the case then that alone could justify the use of deadly force.
I watched a video of the shooting on TV where it appeared the victim apparently gained access to a building, or was about to. What the video clearly showed was a gun coming from around the corner and squeezing one off. This video was taken from outside the building. Now there is bound to be security footage of that entrance door from the inside. If such a video exists, it will give much more detail.
I’m suspecting the chickshit cop had never been in a situation like this and fired the weapon based on fear, not training.
But there is one thing for certain, in today’s lawless world, law, order, evidence and facts no longer matter. Regardless if this was purposeful murder or a justifiable shooting, it will be under the carpet just like the fraudulent election, Biden’s China dealings and anything else that is now fully corrupt.
Our DC politicians are just giddy to be back into the obama era. The RINO’s now get to enjoy their second place status just like the pre-Civil War house servants did. These slaves got better treatment, better food, better clothes and quarters as compared to the field slaves. They were called “House N*****’s”. And that is exactly what our worthless RINO’s are. In the House of Representatives, that name literally applies to them.
“It was a bad shoot.”
Right up there with that one in (was it Arizona? Nevada?) where the cops had the guy on the floor in the hallway, and one cop was telling him not to move and another cop was telling him to crawl toward them. The poor guy didn’t know what to do, so he raised his head to ask and he was immediately blown away. I heard somewhere that both cops soon fled the country.
and she had a couple of policemen with M-4’s behind her, ready to shoot her in the back if they thought she was dangerous.
A federal office may use deadly force in 3 and only 3 situations.
1To defend their own lives or against grievous broadly harm.
2 To defend the life of their partner
3 To defend the life of an incent 3rd party.
I fail to see how he met any of the criteria.