Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VeniVidiVici

Discovery?

No proof of what she has asserted has ever been allowed in court, and I doubt that will change.

They have a slam dunk case against her.


12 posted on 01/09/2021 6:53:41 PM PST by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Balding_Eagle

The courts said she had no standing and kept her evidence out of the court on that basis.

Dominion just opened the door to the courts for whatever evidence she has plus everything Dominion has managed to keep to themselves so far.

The case won’t be about deciding the election but it will be all about what Dominion did and didn’t do.


14 posted on 01/09/2021 6:59:26 PM PST by TigersEye (2020 - The year of massive frauds. Impeachment - masks - lockdowns - Biden - elections...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Balding_Eagle

“They have a slam dunk case against her.”

No, they do not.


23 posted on 01/09/2021 7:22:32 PM PST by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Balding_Eagle

Balding_Eagle, this is not an election lawsuit with “standing” problems aplenty. Sidney Powell automatically has standing to demand discovery by virtue of being named a defendant in a defamation lawsuit. If Dominion even tries to stonewall on discovery, the trial court will have no choice but to force discovery on Dominion. If discovery reveals facts that tend to prove that Sidney Powell is entitled to the defense of truth, the trial court will be forced to admit same into evidence and give on-the-merits consideration to Powell’s truth defense. Otherwise Powell is entitled to appeal up the chain as far as she needs to, up to and including SCOTUS, to vindicate her basic due process rights. That’s a fight Powell, of all people, is bound to win. Simply put, there is no contrary judicial precedent of any kind to justify that kind of behavior on Dominion’s part (hiding) or by the trial court (shielding). Dominion has no way to win without opening the kimono far enough to show that it’s been on the up-and-up this whole time, thus disproving Powell’s defense that she’s been doing nothing other than telling the truth.

Now that Dominion has filed its threatened defamation suit against Powell, it must either submit to discovery and let nature take its course, settle the case privately to the satisfaction of the Court, or drop its lawsuit with prejudice. There are literally no other ways that this suit can end, provided Powell does not give up, but instead fights for her rights. Do you doubt that she will fight?


24 posted on 01/09/2021 7:48:37 PM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Balding_Eagle
"No proof of what she has asserted has ever been allowed in court, and I doubt that will change."

Not even when it comes to defense in this lawsuit?

29 posted on 01/09/2021 8:08:36 PM PST by TXnMA (The Democrat Party has a single-element strategy: CHEATING... Reinstate Public Executions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Balding_Eagle

What part of “I doubt” supports “they have”?


34 posted on 01/09/2021 9:53:43 PM PST by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Balding_Eagle

Why not? Back in the ‘90s the government got Microsoft to cough up code. I would think Powell can get “Dominion” to do the same.


39 posted on 01/10/2021 8:32:05 AM PST by VeniVidiVici ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson