Skip to comments.
Intelligence analysts downplayed Chinese election influence to avoid supporting Trump policies, inspector finds
washington examiner ^
| 1/7/2021
| Jerry Dunleavy
Posted on 01/07/2021 2:41:55 PM PST by bitt
Politicization problems exist in U.S. spy agency assessments on foreign influence in the 2020 U.S. election, including analysts who appeared to hold back information on Chinese meddling efforts because they disagreed with the Trump administration's policies, according to an intelligence community inspector.
Barry Zulauf, an analytic ombudsman and longtime intelligence official, issued a 14-page report obtained by the Washington Examiner to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, revealing his investigation was “conducted in response to IC complaints regarding the election threat issue." In addition, he lamented the “polarized atmosphere has threatened to undermine the foundations of our Republic, penetrating even into the Intelligence Community.”
The intelligence community’s classified assessment on foreign influence in the 2020 election, which will not focus on claims of mail-in fraud or unfounded allegations of voting machines flipping millions of votes, was also submitted to Congress on Thursday. Expected in December, the assessment was delayed as senior intelligence officials clashed over the role played by China, and as director of national intelligence, John Ratcliffe sought to include more viewpoints in the final analysis.
“Given analytic differences in the way Russia and China analysts examined their targets, China analysts appeared hesitant to assess Chinese actions as undue influence or interference. The analysts appeared reluctant to have their analysis on China brought forward because they tend to disagree with the administration’s policies, saying in effect, I don’t want our intelligence used to support those policies,” Zulauf concluded, saying this behavior violated analytic standards requiring independence from political considerations.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bidenvoters; chicoms; china; election; fraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
1
posted on
01/07/2021 2:41:55 PM PST
by
bitt
To: bitt
So special. All bad guys are Russians, didn’t you know that?
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...
3
posted on
01/07/2021 2:43:48 PM PST
by
bitt
(Anton Chekov: “Any idiot can face a crisis; it's this day-to-day living that wears you out.”)
To: bitt
Those who shouted about Russian collusion were colluding with China at the same time.
4
posted on
01/07/2021 2:44:37 PM PST
by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: bitt
So what does the inspector do? Bad analysis by political bias. Through it out and have a senior intel officer re-write it.
5
posted on
01/07/2021 2:44:38 PM PST
by
Salvavida
To: bitt
Comes out just hours after congress certifies the election. Nice.
6
posted on
01/07/2021 2:45:14 PM PST
by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths. )
To: bitt
So, in essence, they held back critical information from the POTUS and his administration...and lied about it.
7
posted on
01/07/2021 2:45:16 PM PST
by
lgjhn23
(Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
To: bitt
8
posted on
01/07/2021 2:46:01 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: bitt
Just wait till all the super big proof comes out the 21st of this month. The whole world will find out the truth. They will say oops, we will fix it now.
To: glimmerman70
The whole world will find out the truth. They will say oops, we will fix it now withe our magic wand and the help of the tooth fairy
10
posted on
01/07/2021 2:53:24 PM PST
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: bitt
Biden’s Weaponized Banana Republic working for the Chinese.
11
posted on
01/07/2021 2:53:41 PM PST
by
Chgogal
(Welcome to Biden's Banana Republic. )
To: bitt
Don’t forget that a high ranking DOD official admitted they lied about troop numbers in the sandbox to Trump because they disagreed with removing more troops.
I wonder how that would have been portrayed under the last administration?
12
posted on
01/07/2021 2:54:48 PM PST
by
volunbeer
(Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
To: bitt; Liz; GregNH; LucyT
[Intelligence analysts downplayed Chinese election influence to avoid supporting Trump policies, inspector finds]
Seems like a Special Prosecutor needs to be appointed in the next 12-13 days to investigate this collusion.
13
posted on
01/07/2021 2:55:26 PM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: bitt; Liz; GregNH; LucyT
[Intelligence analysts downplayed Chinese election influence to avoid supporting Trump policies, inspector finds]
Seems like a Special Prosecutor needs to be appointed in the next 12-13 days to investigate this collusion.
14
posted on
01/07/2021 2:55:26 PM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: bitt
Surprise, surprise, surprise.
15
posted on
01/07/2021 2:57:30 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: bitt
16
posted on
01/07/2021 3:01:11 PM PST
by
Stravinsky
(Politeness will not defeat the Marxist revolutionaries)
To: bitt
Good grief… Could the purposeful timing of those intent on preserving corrupt intelligence and U.S. government institutions be any more transparent?
As CTH noted weeks ago, the DNI report on foreign involvement in 2020 election interference could structurally have established the framework for election challenges on the basis of the guarantee clause of the constitution. However, in order for that to be effective it would be needed prior to the congressional certification of the electors.
Today, literally hours after congress votes to certify the election results, that very same DNI report is now delivered to congress.
Buried inside an article noting that politically motivated intelligence officers intentionally withheld information about China’s active involvement in the 2020 election, we find this sentence:
“The intelligence community’s classified assessment on foreign influence in the 2020 election … was also submitted to Congress on Thursday.” (link)
WASHINGTON DC – Politicization problems exist in U.S. spy agency assessments on foreign influence in the 2020 U.S. election, including analysts who appeared to hold back information on Chinese meddling efforts because they disagreed with the Trump administration’s policies, according to an intelligence community inspector.
Barry Zulauf, an analytic ombudsman and longtime intelligence official, issued a 14-page report obtained by the Washington Examiner to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, revealing his investigation was “conducted in response to IC complaints regarding the election threat issue.” In addition, he lamented the “polarized atmosphere has threatened to undermine the foundations of our Republic, penetrating even into the Intelligence Community.”
The intelligence community’s classified assessment on foreign influence in the 2020 election, which will not focus on claims of mail-in fraud or unfounded allegations of voting machines flipping millions of votes, was also submitted to Congress on Thursday.
Expected in December, the assessment was delayed as senior intelligence officials clashed over the role played by China, and as director of national intelligence, John Ratcliffe sought to include more viewpoints in the final analysis.
“Given analytic differences in the way Russia and China analysts examined their targets, China analysts appeared hesitant to assess Chinese actions as undue influence or interference.
The analysts appeared reluctant to have their analysis on China brought forward because they tend to disagree with the administration’s policies, saying in effect, I don’t want our intelligence used to support those policies,” Zulauf concluded, saying this behavior violated analytic standards requiring independence from political considerations. (more)
17
posted on
01/07/2021 3:02:00 PM PST
by
Bratch
To: MtnClimber
I’m shocked, shocked I tell you!
18
posted on
01/07/2021 3:06:31 PM PST
by
rdl6989
( )
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Yeah, a few more of these articles and I’m gunna go ballistic.
To: bitt
20
posted on
01/07/2021 3:08:04 PM PST
by
Bratch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson