> Are you saying that using tree rings to determine the temperature is not that accurate? <
The really troubling thing about all these Global Warming measurements is that you are never told the estimate of uncertainty. Such estimates can be calculated, and should be a part of any scientific measurement. But you never see them with Global Warming.
I suspect that Global Warming measurements have a estimate of uncertainty so large as to make the measurement itself worthless.
“I suspect that Global Warming measurements have a estimate of uncertainty so large as to make the measurement itself worthless.I suspect that Global Warming measurements have a estimate of uncertainty so large as to make the measurement itself worthless.”
Absolutely. Considering the accuracy of thermometers back them (and most of the world didn’t even have them) pretending knowing temperatures within a tenth of a degree is ludicrous.
And not just that, but to do a meaningful comparison between now and then the thermometers would have to be at the same location over a couple hundred years.
Go to your backyard with an infrared laser thermometer and take some readings here and there and see how much variation there. That’s true even inside the house where temperature is more uniform.
Global warming “science” is more scientology than science