[TiGuy22]

Leftists will say these were mail ins which everyone knew would favor Biden. Nothing to see here. How to refute?

[Democrats hate too much]

They could argue these are main ballots and Trump pushed people to vote in person.

[Diogenesis]

this was CHEATING SEDITION,
so far successfully led by “judge” ROBERTS (Malta, MI-6)
in the coverup of election theft and massive child rape.

[Freee-dame]

When the massive vote fraud becomes so obvious that even Democrats will have to admit that it happened, will they say “mistakes were made” or continue to deny it? They are too smart to ever admit that they were complicit in any illegal activity. Sadly, Republican office holders in many swing states allowed it to happen.

The media will find one Republican voter who voted twice and equate that with the massive fraud by Dems. This will be like CNN founder Ted Turner’s 10 part documentary on the Cold War in which he equated Kent State with the Soviet Union’s gulag.

[nagant]

This is interesting information which could lead somewhere eventually. However, unless you can show where the “dumped” votes originated you might as well look for greener pastures.

[kvanbrunt2]

I just wish they would stop looking at the TV/AP/Edison news feeds as actual voting data. For all we know they purposefully manipulated these TV feeds just to confuse investigators and distract from the massive fraud on the ground. No oversight, more votes than voters, etc.

[systemjim]

. . . suspicious floods of ballots trickling in . . . all were in favor of Joe Biden.

Nothing to see here. Move on.

[semimojo]

“Ten-sigma jumps have a probability of 1 in 10^23,” the report notes.

This is idiotic.

It might be statistically improbable if you assume a 50/50 chance of any given vote being for Trump/Biden but no one assumes that for mail in ballots.