Posted on 01/02/2021 9:45:55 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Don’t go away mad, Gorthaur.
> It is so important to get this right: the Legislatures DID NOT send alternative slates
If you’re going to go there, MI legislators didn’t send anyone. The Capitol was barred to not only Trump electors but the MI legislators. The governor and SoS sent Biden electors.
In the other states legislators were kept from acting. No point pretending the Biden group are the real or legit electors.
> So, you think it’s a good idea to establish a precedent where the sitting VP gets to choose the next President? Seems like there might be a bit of a problem with that. How would you like Harris to have that kind of power?
You’re saying, “Let’s not defend the country against the destruction of its election and the takeover by fraud of the CCP.”
??!??!!!
If there’s bad precedent being set, our team didn’t do it.
The uniparty and the CCP have conspired to install a puppet president who will move us swiftly toward a global socialist oligarchy and you’re worried about setting a bad precedent?!
I have read the scenario where neither the "certified" Biden electors from the contested states nor the Trump electors from those same states are counted and Trump still prevails with a total count for the rest of the states of something like 232 for Trump and 222 for Biden.
IOW, with the "steal" taken out of the equation completely, Trump still wins. If his alternative electors in those contested states are counted, he wins by a bigger margin.
There is no way the framers of the constitution wanted a candidate to prevail who got there by some states not following the constitutional requirements in their elections.
So however the count is handled on January 6th such that those "illegal" electors, certified or not, are not included in the mix, Trump should still legally prevail.
Please don't contaminate this thick soup of fantasy theories with the unwelcome astringent taste of logic and reason.
Thanks, TM!
January 6, 2021 Bookmark.
“Chief Justice Roberts has said he is motivated only by political violence.”
Did he say that to you or on TV?
No.6 wrote: “If there’s bad precedent being set, our team didn’t do it.”
But, you will have to live with the precedents you set. Think VP Harris picking the next president.
elenvee wrote: “The uniparty and the CCP have conspired to install a puppet president who will move us swiftly toward a global socialist oligarchy and you’re worried about setting a bad precedent?!”
Yes, we will get past this. We’ve been bombarded with hyperbolic forecasts of the future in the past. We do not need to burn the Constitution.
We fight this by keeping the senate in 2020, taking the house in 2022, and winning the white house in 2024. Then we enact comprehensive election reforms.
We won the white house in 2020. What do you think will be different in 2024, or even during the current Senate runoff in GA?
So he can be just another Spiro Agnew or Walter Mondale. Or he can be one of the great historical figures of American history.
We will know by next week at this time.
Thanks for outing yourself as a liar for the uniparty.
Anyone who can dismiss the massive fraud both manual and electronic and pretend “we’ll get em next time” as if there will be a fair election is gaslighting us.
You can’t bury the knowledge everyone now has — not only this one but who knows how many past elections were orchestrated. This one was just so massive that it became obvious. Now the uniparty is trying to make a whole country forget.
Family Guy wrote: “We won the white house in 2020. What do you think will be different in 2024, or even during the current Senate runoff in GA?”
I know what will be different once we set the precedent of allowing the VP to choose the next President. I can’t believe conservatives are actually supporting that nonsense.
“...keeping the senate in 2020, taking the house in 2022, and winning the white house in 2024.”
How? You really think the dems are not going to do this next time? Ludicrously naive.
No.6 wrote: “Thanks for outing yourself as a liar for the uniparty.”
So now ones defense of the Constitution makes them a ‘liar for the uniparty’?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.