RE: All of these objections will eventually fail.
But do you still support the objection? Or is it your contention that because it is an exercise in futility, there should be no objection at all - just proceed as if nothing irregular happened?
To make an analogy — The men of Alamo should simply have surrendered to the Mexicans because their resistance would eventually result in their deaths?
The DOJ and local state enforcement officials have investigated and said there is no wide spread fraud that could over turn the election. Trump’s team of lawyers and agents have failed to prove widespread fraud that could over turn the election in various courts, failed to take fraud cases to court (though saying there was fraud in public) and failed to take steps to win cases on mail in ballots before the election in various courts. Thus, there should be no objection at all.