Posted on 12/31/2020 6:20:36 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The man who invented and patented the technology that lets you scan items at the grocery store, create an airport boarding pass, and generate authentication codes just blew the doors off the Georgia State Senate subcommittee hearing on elections.
Tech expert Jovan Hutton Pulitzer claimed that to the extent there were election issues in Georgia, they could be explained by simply looking at the paper ballots. And he claimed to prove in real time that the system was susceptible to manipulation via WiFi because his team had broken in and were in it at the time of the hearing.
Pulitzer basically threw down, telling a Georgia Senate subcommittee looking into voter fraud to show him the ballots, give him two hours, and he’d show them if there was election fraud in Fulton County.
I only care what that piece of paper tells us. The paper, the paper. Verify the vote, verify the vote.
[…] I can determine where ink comes from, where paper comes from, whether it was mailed, whether it was folded, the difference of a duplicated press” and a mass copier.
Pulitzer wants to see the paper ballot because what he’s seen so far looks entirely janky.
He told the lawmakers that it’s not about the code in the machines that caused 93% of them to be set aside to be “adjudicated” by humans; all he needs to do is get a look the “Holy Grail” – the physical paper ballots.
In #GA, Jovan Hutton Pulitzer asked why the physical ballots were different between areas of the same county and for each political party.
He claims the paper ballots will tell if there was electoral fraud. pic.twitter.com/b8Gvs3tuzh
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
I kid you not.
Unfortunately, unlike sentient people, the Demonicrats and RINOcrats in the Georgia State Senate do not recognize truth and reality. It’s like it never happened.
RE: We had one poster here yesterday complaining how Pulitzer’s login to the machine was an illegal hack.
I think either the poster was being facetious or is ignorant.
Not all hacking is illegal. There is a term called ETHICAL HACKING ( also known as “White Hat” hacking ).
The term “white hat” in Internet slang refers to an ethical computer hacker, or a computer security expert, who specializes in penetration testing and in other testing methodologies that ensures the security of an organization’s information systems and to demonstrate a computer system’s security flaws in order for organizations to further strengthen their security.
*THAT* is what Jovan Pulitzer was engaged in.
the subcommittee voted to allow him access to analyze the ballots. Let’s see if the full legislature has the guts to vote for this.
I watched most of the GA hearing yesterday and it was compelling. I understand the committee ordered one county to undergo an actual ballot audit by Mr. Pulitzer. Fraud throughout the GA general election, and real-time hack of their early vote primary.
None of this is getting media coverage. Nothing.
What IF (a crime so I oppose this) a white hat ha Jed into the system and posted a fat ZERO Dem votes in say three counties.
Would then Dems sue and admit that the system could be hacked?
Would they lack standing?
Interesting question only.
Been Watching 5 screens all morning....ONLY Newsmax had touched the subject twice including showing Mr. Pulitzer announcing they had Hacked into the Wi-Fi and controlled the voting machine ACTIVELY in use in RUN OFF election.
DEC6...CU there
thx for posting this. I need to learn more about it.
Everyone needs to see this guy. He is awesome, does it with autority.
Yoi are half right ...JAN 6. (Sorry had to)
I kid you not.
I think it would have been grand if he'd given the republicans a quarter million votes each.
Then blandly give the democrats and MSM a choice of accepting those votes or admitting voter fraud can happen...
“None of this is getting media coverage. Nothing.”
Brought to you by our totally unbiased media complex.
True, and on the radio this morning I heard the Lt. Governor demeaning the sub committee, fellow Republicans, as chasing lunatic theories. Sheesh, what is in the water in GA.
Yes, an interesting question I’ve been pondering it too.
You may remember the case in NC, in 2018, where they guy was ‘ballot harvesting.’ The amount of votes affected wasn’t enough to change the outcome, (he only collected a couple hundred votes) but due to media coverage there was a special election called and the guy was convicted. That is what happens when the fraud happens on our side.
That’s because this is much larger than a political party. There is no neutral mass media to report this outrage, nor officials with the power and inclination to honestly investigate. They have all chosen sides. Even our own party officials give nothing but tepid responses. ‘We need a committee.’
What was shown in the hearing yesterday was profound. Mr. Pulitzer has the answer definitive to the question of fraud. But I doubt we will ever see it used in Fulton County or anyplace else.
I am realizing that we are no longer represented. We have to plead for legislators to even listen to the evidence. And even though they make the right noises, the system will not let it move forward. Yes, the state senate committee voted to examine the ballots. It won’t happen. We won in 2016 and they have made it openly known that it would never happen again.
In this world the media has constructed being conservative isn’t cool. If you let your political leanings be known to colleagues, you may lose your job or at the least be overlooked for promotion.
Like in fashion, to the media, we are wearing last year’s duds.
Note the finding that there appear to be multiple ways to distinguish visually between ballots likely sent to Republicans and those likely sent to Democrats...and there is no good reason for those differences.
I understand the committee ordered one county to undergo an actual ballot audit by Mr. Pulitzer.
no intent to do harm...
I think we would be shocked if a physical analysis of ballots revealed some were printed in China. However, More likely we will find that thousands of Biden ballots were just copied and run through the counting scanners more than once. The videos of ballots being taken from suitcases from under the table when legally required observers were sent home pretty well says it all.
Trump should name a special counsel to prosecute election fraud. Special Counsel’s first hire is this Pulitzer guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.