[ConservativeMind]

By the way, your Guardian link starts this way:

“Young and previously healthy people with ongoing symptoms of Covid-19 are showing signs of damage to multiple organs four months after the initial infection, a study suggests.“

So your fear porn view here is rightfully not telling us that this is only happening in those with four months of after effects. For all of those with no issue at the four month point in time, things are fine.

Keep making it seem like you are using the population of “all who had COVID-19!”

[MarMema]

Things are less likely to be fine and there is as of yet no correlation with presenting symptoms. Organ damage doesn’t present symptoms all of the time.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/12/201208121044.htm

[alexander_busek]

"Young and previously healthy people with ongoing symptoms of Covid-19 are showing signs of damage to multiple organs four months after the initial infection, a study suggests."

I hate ambiguous statements like that!

FOUR MONTHS

So, can we safely infer that, three months after the initial infection, there was as yet no damage - i.e., that the damage needs a full four months to "get up and running?"

Can we also safely infer that, five months after the initial infection, these "signs of damage" will have completely disappeared?

The significance of mentioning "four months" should have been explained.

ONGOING SYMPTOMS

This needs to be placed in the proper relation: WHAT PERCENTAGE of all Covid-19 victims display ongoing symptoms? Maybe 0.02%? Maybe 0.005%?!

Without specifying that, it makes no sense to be worried about this.

Regards,