“I don’t mean to imply that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are purposely running a diversion scam, just saying we should apply Occam’s razor and look for the simplest explanation.”
I’ve had a variation of the same thought.
I think the Dominion counting machines were just as big a part of the “steal”, but too technical for the general public to understand.
The public needs to be awakened to this fraud in order for enough pressure to be brought to bear on politicians to demand justice. For that reason, I believe the focus right now should be on illegal ballot stuffing, not software data manipulation.
But having said that, the software data manipulation is a huge part of the racket - and essential to any criminal prosecution that comes as a result.
In order to understand the role of the Dominion machines - it is helpful to use the analogy of money laundering. In a grand theft, the proof of the theft is the money - just as the proof of a murder is the body.
Money laundering is a process whereby clean money with no forensic evidence of the crime, is substituted for the dirty money. Once that is done, the criminal can be caught with the money and yet escape consequences - since it can’t be proven that it was the same money that was stolen. The amount can match, the timing can match, but there are no fingerprints, serial numbers, etc.. to prove possession of stolen money.
I believe the election fraud, the illegal ballot stuffing was the actual theft, and the data software manipulation was the “laundering”.
In order to enter the physical ballots into the machines to be scanned and counted, they must be separated from their envelopes, which have the names, signatures, addresses, postmarks and other evidence of validity. The physical ballots are kept but can never be matched to their original envelopes - thus destroying the audit trail. It is impossible to recheck whether a ballot was valid.
As with the money, you can prove 300,000 ballots were not valid, but you can’t know which ones they were!
The machines serve as a laundering operation for stolen votes.
Great post and it’s been going on courtesy of Peter strock junior since 2004.
I think after 2016 they went for an all of the above, belt and suspenders and two-sided tape approach to keep their cheating trousers up high enough for success.