Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 Reasons Why Trump Vetoed the Military Spending Bill
PJ Media ^ | 12/24/2020 | Tyler O' Neill

Posted on 12/24/2020 5:52:54 AM PST by SeekAndFind

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2021. Both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate passed the NDAA by wide margins, more than enough to override the president’s veto. This bill may become the first Trump veto Congress will override.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) supported the bill despite the president’s veto threats, claiming that the NDAA will deter Chinese aggression. Yet Trump claimed that the bill will help China.

“No one has worked harder, or approved more money for the military, than I have — over $2 trillion,” Trump said in a statement. “During my 4 years, with the support of many others, we have almost entirely rebuilt the United States military, which was totally depleted when I took office.”

“Unfortunately, the Act fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military’s history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions. It is a ‘gift’ to China and Russia,” he added.

The president gave five reasons he would oppose the bill even though he strenuously supports military funding.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: defense; defensespending; dod; dodfunding; militaryspending; trump; veto

1 posted on 12/24/2020 5:52:54 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

THE FIVE TOP REASONS:

1. Section 230

President Trump has long called for abolishing or amending Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which grants internet companies key liability for the content that third parties publish on their platforms. Trump specifically called on Congress to strike down Section 230 in the NDAA, threatening to veto the bill without a Section 230 ban.

2. Renaming military bases

The NDAA includes a provision to rename military bases that bear the names of Confederate generals. President Trump has long opposed the campaign to strike Confederate statues and monuments from the public square, rightly arguing that the activists would move from Confederate monuments to monuments of America’s Founding Fathers (as repeatedly happened this summer).

3. Limiting the president’s use of military funds

Trump also faulted the NDAA for restricting “the President’s ability to preserve our Nation’s security by arbitrarily limiting the amount of military construction funds that can be used to respond to a national emergency. In a time when adversaries have the means to directly attack the homeland, the President must be able to safeguard the American people without having to wait for congressional authorization.”

4. Slowing the rollout of 5G

Trump also claimed that an amendment in the bill “would slow down the rollout of nationwide 5G, especially in rural areas.” The NDAA seems to involve two 5G-related provisions: a measure to “support the development of a 5G wireless network by establishing the Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund and the Multilateral Telecommunications Security Fund,” and a measure to reduce foreign influence in 5G — combatting the influence of Chinese technology.

5. Preventing Trump from bringing troops home

Finally, the president claimed that the NDAA restricts his ability to bring American troops home from overseas.

“Numerous provisions of the Act directly contradict my Administration’s foreign policy, particularly my efforts to bring our troops home,” Trump explained. “I oppose endless wars, as does the American public. Over bipartisan objections, however, this Act purports to restrict the President’s ability to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, Germany, and South Korea.”


2 posted on 12/24/2020 5:54:38 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bingo. No more fill bills with pork like add one that benefits the wrong causes, countries and lines the pols pockets


3 posted on 12/24/2020 5:56:29 AM PST by patriotspride (Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I Trust Trump!


4 posted on 12/24/2020 5:58:08 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Here’s another 5 reasons: Schumer, McConnell, Murkowski, Romney, Collins


5 posted on 12/24/2020 6:02:18 AM PST by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“Numerous provisions of the Act directly contradict my Administration’s foreign policy, particularly my efforts to bring our troops home,” Trump explained. “I oppose endless wars, as does the American public. Over bipartisan objections, however, this Act purports to restrict the President’s ability to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, Germany, and South Korea.

Unconstitutional on its surface. The POTUS is CiC and can direct the forces anywhere except to war without congress putting its corrupt and heavily bribed self into it.

6 posted on 12/24/2020 6:40:13 AM PST by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Bring them home and let the Supreme Court or Congress muster their men under arms to prevent it.


7 posted on 12/24/2020 7:28:23 AM PST by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: steveyp

If they override this bill I am officially a man without a party and will pray for revolution. I am 50% there as it stands right now.


8 posted on 12/24/2020 8:01:57 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) supported the bill despite the president’s veto threats, claiming that the NDAA will deter Chinese aggression.”

Right, McConnell wants to deter China. He is so deep in with China through his wife that deterring China would be a detriment to his finances. He has a huge conflict of interest in addition to being a liar.


9 posted on 12/24/2020 8:55:50 AM PST by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson