Posted on 12/23/2020 6:45:32 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The Black Lives Matter umbrella group Detroit Will Breathe sued Detroit, alleging police abuse of force during the George Floyd riots in the city this past summer. A judge granted a restraining order in September but the city responded with a countersuit, claiming that the Black Lives Matter group organized a “civil conspiracy” to riot, destroy property, and disturb the peace.
According to Detroit’s countersuit, the protesters “illegally, maliciously, and wrongfully conspired with one another with the intent to and for the illegal purpose of disturbing the peace, engaging in disorderly conduct, inciting riots, destroying public property, resisting or obstructing officers in charge of duty, and committing acts of violence against [the city] and [Detroit Police Department] officers.”
The suit claims that police officers and the City of Detroit “sustained injuries and damages” including physical injuries, pain and suffering, property damage, loss of business opportunities, and more. The city asks the court to award “general and compensatory damages equal to” the losses the city sustained, along with punitive damages, a judgment the Black Lives Matter group illegally conspired, and attorneys’ fees.
The city claims the First Amendment does not protect the rioters’ activities because “the protests in Detroit have repeatedly turned violent, endangering the lives of police and the public.” This violence has harmed police officers, allegedly causing “cracked vertebrae, lacerations, and concussions.”
Importantly, the Detroit countersuit cites various Black Lives Matter videos Detroit Will Breathe promoted, some of which “show speakers encouraging violence or endorsing violence against police officers, promoting the destruction and defacing of property, and disrupting the lives of Detroit residents.”
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
However, the case also raises First Amendment concerns. At what point does protesting cross the line into conspiracy to riot, disturb the peace, and destroy property? While many antifa and Black Lives Matter groups have arguably crossed that line by advocating physical violence in the name of fighting “fascism” and “racism,” courts need to be very careful to avoid penalizing genuine peaceful protest.
Detroit first filed the lawsuit in September, but The Intercept drew attention to it this week.
“Welcome to the party, pal”
Dismantle this Marxist hate group called BLM
Pot calling the kettle black.
Is that raciss?
What?! I’m amazed. I didn’t think there was a single Dem who would stand up to this.
Even if cities and municipalities succeed in suing BLM for riots, not a single penny will go to the businesses they destroyed.
It may open the door for individual civil suits though.
RICO
Seize BLM’s natioanist er national org funds. They are interstate racketeers.
>>Even if cities and municipalities succeed in suing BLM for riots, not a single penny will go to the businesses they destroyed.
Under RICO, you get access to ALL of their money, not just restitution for damages.
They are racketeers. Just like Papa Doc Sharpton.
And maybe mere enforcement of existing laws against property destruction.
Frankly, I'm amazed that anyone could tell the difference that the BLM riots damaged Detroit at all. I mean c'mon man, it's Detroit! It's been a burned out/vandalized/shithole for decades already. What was left to damage in Detroit?
Good. blm is a terrorist organization, and all members are deserving of spending time behind bars.
About time someone got off the pot and did something.
Recently, world class idiot, Alec Baldwin, made the remark that POTUS should receive the knee on the neck, just as George Floyd did; with his windpipe closed off. Two facts:
1. George Floyd was laying on his chest. It is not possible for the knee on the back of neck to pinch the windpipe. I have demostrated this (to myself and others) more than once.
2. The investigation into George Floyd’s death has shown, drugs killed the man, not the knee on the neck.
There needs to be a massive “knee on the neck” demonstration, with dozens of people doing the procedure, at the SAME time, so the general public can see that is not even close to deadly (provided that the ‘victim’ isn’t in the process of overdosing on dangerous drugs).
I have demonstrated to family members that the knee on the neck looks bad, but only left me (age 66) with a small bruise on the side of the head and a little soreness on my left chest for a couple of days. During the process I was able to breathe with somewhat more than normal effort. After all, the knee was on the back and side of the neck, not the front. My windpipe and arteries were pretty much unaffected during the procedure.
According to records Mr Chauvin weighs about 180#. He was in a four point stance (weight distributed on two knees and two feet), which would put approximately 45# on Mr Floyd’s neck. Sure, Chauvin may have leaned harder on his left knee. Maybe he put 60 or more # on the neck. I noticed from the many pics that Mr Floyd, even while handcuffed was able get his right hand in a position to raise his right chest off the pavement somewhat. And with some twisting at the hips, the right chest area is even more relieved of pressure on the chest, and some of the twist off of the neck. (Mine has been abused, even fractured in the past).
LOL!
Thx for posting this.
I wonder why they’re not suing the ubiquitous White Supremists?
Then the judges are doxed and threatened, and the radicals win again. I have little hope that justice will prevail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.