Sorry to have provided an alternate point of view. I will be more careful in future.
I admit to a visceral dislike of Cornell interpretations based on Cornell’s effect on my eldest son.
I grant you that suspicion of Cornell's conclusions or Cornell's analysis may be warranted, depending on the circumstances. But the law is the law, and regardless of Cornell's biases I have no reason to believe that they did not post the law accurately word for word. And the powers and duties of the Senate and the House are clearly stated.
I grant you that suspicion of Cornell's conclusions or Cornell's analysis may be warranted, depending on the circumstances. But the law is the law, and regardless of Cornell's biases I have no reason to believe that they did not post the law accurately word for word. And the powers and duties of the Senate and the House are clearly stated.