What the court ruled is that the plaintiff did not succeed on the second and third points, i.e. the Secretary of State was not the person or office certifying the signatures and the remediation requested was not something the court could order under state law.
Yep. This isn't the CCP controlled Deep State™ using their evil technicalities. This is limited government - a bedrock conservative principle! - in action. The state does not have the power to order more scrutiny of mail ballot signatures; authority over those matters is devolved to the counties and that is where the case should be brought.
Indeed, if they filed this case in a large county and won, maybe then they would have standing at the state level with an equal protection argument. (I am not a lawyer, just speculating.)
Your comment is utter nonsense.