Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
And there is NOTHING that can be done about it, you miserable, hopeless deplorables! Just one week ago today...

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

CASE NO.: 2020AP2038

COMPLETE TITLE:
Donald J. Trump, Michael R. Pence (et al)
        Plaintiffs-Appellants

    v.

    Joseph R. Biden, Kamala D. Harris (et al)
        Defendants-Respondents.

OPINION FILED: December 14, 2020

ORAL ARGUMENT: December 12, 2020

...the Campaign seeks to invalidate the ballots——either directly or through a drawdown——of more than 220,000 Wisconsin voters in Dane and Milwaukee Counties.

The Campaign focuses its objections on four different categories of ballots——each applying only to voters in Dane County and Milwaukee County. First, it seeks to strike all ballots cast by voters who claimed indefinitely confined status since March 25, 2020. Second, it argues that a form used for in-person absentee voting is not a "written application" and therefore all in-person absentee ballots should be struck. Third, it maintains that municipal officials improperly added witness information on absentee ballot certifications, and that these ballots are therefore invalid. Finally, the Campaign asserts that all ballots collected at "Democracy in the Park," two City of Madison events in late September and early October, were illegally cast.

We conclude the Campaign is not entitled to the relief it seeks. The challenge to the indefinitely confined voter ballots is meritless on its face, and the other three categories of ballots challenged fail under the doctrine of laches.


"Meritless on its face." Hundreds of thousands of people flagrantly violated election law and committed felonies with penalties up to a year in prison and it is just dismissed as "Meritless on its face."

It must be nice to live life in a politically favored class.

8 posted on 12/21/2020 8:32:43 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom ("Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out" -- David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

LOL So the Pa court is basically saying that they refuse to throw out fraudulent votes saying it will disenfranchise the fraudsters?? But ignore the legal votes that are being disenfranchised by those same fraudulent votes?!

Good grief! What rope are these idiot judges smoking? Complete joke and BS! Legal sophistry in order to protect the election outcome.


10 posted on 12/21/2020 8:47:08 AM PST by Bellagio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson