Patrick Byrne asserted several weeks ago that the democrats had planned to steal the 2016 elections for Hillary Clinton via the same techniques alleged this year. He further asserted that it didn't happen because someone shut it down -- and that he (Byrne) knew who shut it down. Then ... crickets.
If Byrne has this kind of smoking gun direct testimony, he should have brought it forward weeks ago. He didn't. That's when I concluded that Byrne, like a number of others, talked well beyond what he could evidence.