Posted on 12/20/2020 3:37:32 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Did they have to say this to avoid a lawsuit?
I think this is a smoke screen article from a suspect ‘conservative’ site.
If you are really Honest ( as your screen name tells us ), could you please dispense with one sentence comments and directly tell us where the article is wrong and inaccurate?
Michigan Elections Director Jonathan Brater vs, Russell Ramsland
Brater knocked to the floor in 1st minute of round One.
Ramsland has a gentleman’s voice with an ability to talk at both the highest scientific level and to the ordinary folks in a supermarket checkout line. He will have any judge and jury see this was blatant fraud, no question.
Russel Ramsland, Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG), long venerable history in cybersecurity and operations.
Has anyone ever heard of this site? It looks phony tome.
Democrat judges are unconvinced by clear evidence of Democrat vote fraud.
Don’t forget, too, that the Department of Homeland Security has specifically rejected Ramsland’s theory about Dominion.
Is that the same Department of Homeland Security that didn't notice that we were under cyberattack for six months? 
This is an article from “Hot Air”. other article at this site is also from “Hot Air”. Seems this site is just repackaging their articles to give an impression that they are from a conservative site.
It’s clickbait garbage, and I’ve never heard of it before, either.
I did some cursory searches and couldn't find anything. Their site has no "About Us" page either.
Article proven false. Fake news
I hate to agree, but it would be stupid to try and manipulate electronic vote tallies knowing that hand recounts might be conducted. That said, if I went to a machine and no one showed me the ballot, I would just assume that the touch screen was the vote, and I wouldn’t think anything of it.
Of course the hand counts could have been rigged. But I think the fraud came from mail-in ballots, duplicates and harvesting and bribes for votes from people who wouldn’t have voted otherwise.
That last is a big red flag.
Really? Do they? I was skeptical and started doing some research on ASOG.
https://www.corporationwiki.com/p/32f1ln/allied-special-operations-group-llc
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3917097/posts?page=34#34
Ramsland’s history, not ADOG’s. Ramsland founded ASOG with others relatively recently.
The consultant DID confuse MI and MN counties.
He also..
- Thought 1/250,000 is .0008% (it’s not, it’s .0004%). Doesn’t help when that blatant of a mistake is in your first paragraph.
- Did indeed list MN counties in a previous report, claiming they were MI counties.
- Had wrong “over-vote” totals in his MN list (sometimes by a factor of 10X+).
- On his “corrected” list of counties, listed the same county or city multiple times in the same list..sometimes right on top of each other (eg: Shelby Township, followed on the very next line by..Shelby Township).
That’s just a sample. But when you make basic, rudimentary errors like this, you give the other side plenty of ammo to discredit things - whether the rest of the data is right or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.