Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RipSawyer

[I wonder how long it will be until ONLY gay men are eligible to sit on federal courts including the supremes.]


Gay men? That’s regressive by current Democrat standards. Gay gender fluid individuals. Collectives? Does it have to be one person? Maybe a grouping whose membership can be refreshed as members die off so the seat can be held for posterity. After all, wasn’t white patriarchy just such a group? The mind boggles at the possibilities.


52 posted on 12/20/2020 9:49:45 AM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

“Gay men? That’s regressive by current Democrat standards.”

You’re right of course, I am guilty of making an offhand comment without thinking it through. When we have fifteen supreme court justices there will have to be one of each gender. Maybe there will have to be 69 justices.


55 posted on 12/20/2020 10:04:08 AM PST by RipSawyer (I'm all out of sarc tags.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson