Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coroner: State included a murder-suicide in Grand’s COVID deaths [ Winter Park, Colorado ]
Sky-Hi News ^ | 12/16/2020 | Amy Golden

Posted on 12/16/2020 7:52:34 PM PST by george76

The Grand County coroner is disputing the number of COVID-19 deaths the state is reporting for the county.

Brenda Bock told county commissioners on Tuesday that the state is reporting two additional COVID-19 deaths in Grand, which she believes should not be included.

The coroner maintains that only one person in the county has died from COVID-19, while two more people have died with it, for a total of three COVID-related deaths in the county. However, the state is reporting five for Grand.

In disputing the numbers, Bock explained that a couple who died of gunshot wounds late last month have been included in the state’s numbers. The state told Bock those deaths are included in the count because the two tested positive for COVID-19 within 30 days before their death.

Bock called the state’s reporting “false and misleading.”

“The two cases were autopsied, and the cause of death was listed as ‘blunt force injuries due to a gunshot wound,’” Bock said of what police determined to be a murder-suicide. “Nowhere did the pathologist say COVID was the cause of death.”

She conceded that while the two extra deaths might not make a big difference to the state, adding them to Grand’s count increases the county’s COVID deaths by 40%. She said she is working with the state to try and get the deaths removed.

“If we want the public to trust and believe the information being released, we need to make sure it is accurate,” Bock said.

Grand County Public Health Director Brene Belew-Ladue explained that state and Centers for Disease Control reporting protocol requires that anyone who tested positive for COVID-19 within 30 days of their death be included in these numbers.

“That might be the process, but it’s not right,” Bock responded. “I strongly stand against that … We do need to stand up and we do need to get these numbers corrected.”

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment counts COVID-19 deaths in two different ways from two separate sources of data — deaths caused by COVID-19 and deaths among people who died with COVID-19.

Most recent numbers report that 3,086 people in Colorado have died because of COVID compared to 3,969 deaths with COVID.

Deaths listed as caused by COVID-19 come from death certificates. These causes of death are determined directly by health care providers and coroners.

Alternatively, deaths for people who died with but not necessarily because of COVID-19 come from epidemiological data. Thus, anyone who died within 30 days after testing positive for COVID is included in the count regardless of official cause of death.

The state explained that it uses the epidemiological data to rapidly classify and count deaths consistently. Information reported from death certificates can lag behind by several weeks.

The state has explained that some deaths may not be counted as due to COVID-19 after review at the state or national level. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment said these numbers are expected to be similar once reporting is finished.

The commissioners praised Bock for standing up to get correct information out, emphasizing the importance of accuracy during the pandemic. Grand County’s COVID-19 reporting dashboard does not list the two additional deaths.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: colorado; covid; covid19; covidhoax; gunshot; kungflu
A drunk who died of alcohol poisoning had his death certificate re-classified in Denver by democrat beaurocrazzies .. The Montezuma County Coroner’s Office disputed the (democrat run) state’s claim, saying the drunk actually died of alcohol poisoning..

Cortez.. County Coroner George Deavers and a pathologist determined the cause of death was ethanol toxicity. The person’s blood-alcohol content was 0.55.. a BAC of 0.3 is considered lethal..

COVID was listed on the death certificate to get extra federal Medicare money.. and political scare points..

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3844963/posts

1 posted on 12/16/2020 7:52:34 PM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MileHi; dynachrome; Balata; backspace; bboop; Benito Cereno; bravo whiskey; Bruiser 10; ...

Colorado Ping ( Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)


2 posted on 12/16/2020 7:53:43 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

This covid virus is very potent. It can even shoot a gun!


3 posted on 12/16/2020 7:56:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

There are those who are saying that the tests themselves are fake and only magnify the existence of stuff that is not covid19 and that the more magnification the greater the positive diagnosis. And that the entire test is phony.


4 posted on 12/16/2020 7:58:36 PM PST by Trumpet 1 (US Constitution is my guide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

The gunshot thing is blatant.


5 posted on 12/16/2020 8:01:11 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs. I )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpet 1

The PCR test amplifies genetic matter in cycles.... The problem is that the vast majority of PCR tests have a threshold of 40 cycles.. — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left.. ~Dr. Michael Mina, an epidemiologist from Harvard..

Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California is incredulous that this high a threshold has been established for the PCR test:

“I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive.”

Translation: If it requires 40 cycles to return a positive PCR test, it is a false positive and the patient tested is, in point of fact, negative.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3900464/posts


6 posted on 12/16/2020 8:12:56 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george76

It appears COVID-19 will kill us all, no matter how long it takes. At least according to government stats, that is.


7 posted on 12/16/2020 9:21:51 PM PST by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Damn


8 posted on 12/16/2020 9:27:03 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76; Trumpet 1
Translation: If it requires 40 cycles to return a positive PCR test, it is a false positive and the patient tested is, in point of fact, negative.

A PCR test basically takes bits of DNA, strips it in half, then adds a copy of the half back to both original pieces. So each cycle almost doubles the material that's currently there. If you run 40 cycles, that's two to the power of 40. 2^40

1,099,511,627,776x as much as the original amount. A trillion times as much.

If you happen to have trace amounts of the virus in your nasal cavity, that did its job and blocked the virus from getting in and infecting you, that swab just grabbed it and now you're a "positive" case.

The ChinaVirus is a coronavirus, just like four strains of other coronaviri that are one of several causes of the common cold. Obviously, being in the same group of viri, they'll share a good portion of their DNA makeup. So if you've had a cold recently, you may still have some viral fragments from that in your system, which could be enough DNA for the PCR to pop hot on (for the ChinaVirus).
9 posted on 12/16/2020 9:42:01 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

South Park did a Covid Special. The show was really raunchy, but this clip is perfect for this article.

it is about 30 seconds, and may include a bad word or 2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Mr_pTptZmo


10 posted on 12/17/2020 11:30:29 AM PST by Mass Market (Or wear a MAGA hat downtown and see how much fun that can be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mass Market
South Park did a Covid Special. The show was really raunchy, but this clip is perfect for this article.

Ha nice. I haven't really watched that show (or any others) in years. Think I've only ever gotten up to season eleven or twelve or so.
11 posted on 12/17/2020 8:11:19 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson