I stopped watching her a few weeks ago when she started talking about how we could work with AOC and the Dems. She has a girl crush on AOC that I find disgusting. Won’t be watching her again.
She has become a bone of contention at my house. My wife still wants to watch her. I am totally done with her. So, now at 10pm I just go to bed.
I turned her off the day she urged Trump to “gracefully concede”. It was a day after the election. I used to watch her show every weekday but now she’s history.
“ She has a girl crush on AOC that I find disgusting. ”
************
Well, gotta say; AOC has a fantastic mouth 👄 lol 😂.....
Ingram has a snarky sense of humor, sometimes mistakenly taken for approval....
I did too.
They decided they weren’t going to fight with us. They weren’t going to challenge the results or even question the results.
Why not get that SOB Karl Rove up there and have him explain how Biden got 80 million votes without coat tails.
How he lost 18/19 Bell Weather Counties
How AGs on the down ticket got more votes than Trump.
I mean, she’s done as far as I’m concerned.
Why haven’t started the fight yet.
Not to mention that POS Chris Wallace and what he did to us on Election night and debates.
I have not watched Laura’s show since the election. However, I did watch the YouTube clip of her monologue where she mentioned AOC and it has been distorted here on FR for whatever it’s worth.
Her point, rather inarticulate, appeared to be that populists and the AOC wing could agree that the oligarch class needs to be contained. That was certainly the context to me.
The kneejerk reaction here out of justified anger towards Fox was immediate and it has been parroted non-stop. I don’t need a manufactured issue to turn off Fox - they did that for me with their behavior throughout the election, but the truth matters.
Prior to the election, Laura excoriated “The Squad” and I find it hard to believe she suddenly changed her stance. However, we have to find agreement where we can and if AOC and her ilk do not believe Bloomberg, Gates, Dorsey, and Zuckerberg should not run the country I can agree with them on that point no matter how much I oppose the rest of their agenda.
That is my .02 and the same thing applies to Tucker. I don’t always agree with him nor should you, but the usual cast here on FR and the clickbait punditry and bloggers that increasingly fill the front page here did the same thing over the Sidney Powell thing. Tucker is usually snarky, but he is rather fearless in going after many stories nobody else will touch. Important stories.
He called out Sidney who was doing multiple hits a day lobbing nuclear bombs. Tucker was petulant about it and he responded from his self-importance - it was not his finest moment, but if Sidney produced the Kraken he would be one of the few who would cover it. Sidney is a big girl and she can handle it - she was pretty frazzled when it happened and frankly she needed to get some sleep and I support what she is doing.
The Tucker- Powell spat again became intertwined in the “dump Fox” movement that was eagerly seeking further justification. I cut the cord long ago and have largely ignored the Fox News website since the election, but how many stories have we only heard from Tucker over the past 4 years? That is why he became #1 in the ratings.
Tucker is the Rand Paul of “conservative punditry” in that he is fearless, flawed, and while we don’t always agree with him he hits a home run every so often on a pitch nobody else saw. Given a choice I wish there were ten more of him on television. He is far more accurate and consequential than Gateway Pundit that gets linked here on FR about 100 times a day with clickbait headlines based on the work of others (like Tucker).
Just my .02. You don’t have to “hate” Ingraham, Tucker, or even Interruptus Maximus (Hannity) to stick it to Fox. I stuck it to Fox when I cut the cord and stopped clicking their website multiple times a day.