I guess even Hillsdale hires a dud and a dope every now and then. Unfortunately, this particular Carrington knucklehead went public with his incompetence.
The article is a poor attempt to legitimize the failure of the Supreme Court to rule on the substantial issues raised by Texas v. Pennsylvania. Apparently, in the name of Federalism, the author has no qualms in upholding the results of the only National election, held every four years, by pretending that massive and documented fraud in the swing States had no impact on all of the States and their voters who abided by the State rules put in place to guarantee election integrity. The author’s claim than none of the fraud has been substantiated is laughable. While the author certainly knows how to use the appropriate judicial lingo to sound convincing, he utterly fails when it comes to substance. Sort of like the Supreme Court failed when it chose lack of standing over the merits.