Posted on 12/09/2020 1:56:51 PM PST by Zakeet
I agree it’s called set straight!!!
Overturn the COUP!!!
And hopefully, punish those individuals responsible for these acts of TREASON!!!
Do we know exactly which other states have actually joined as plaintiffs, vs. only filed amicus briefs?
Good point! It wasn’t really an election at all and with China involved, it is a WAR.
Put a Dim in each one of those outhouses and THEN set them on fire!
Just heard this from Greg Jarrett on Hannity Radio:
Jarrett is convinced the SCOTUS is going to punt.
Asking the four states to respond to Texas is pro-forma.
SCOTUS is going to punt...says Jarrett.
Well folks!
It looks like this is IT.
SCOTUS will listen to the evidence.
Or they won’t.
They OWE it to the American public to HEAR this case or they can all just go to hell as far as I’m concerned.
SCOTUS does NOT need to be dicking around with this, trying to pass the buck.
We’ve had enough!
The facts need to be heard.
The case needs to be heard and then if they want to do the WRONG thing, disenfranchise the people who elected Trump LEGALLY (and I truly believe he won the popular vote), and stick us with a senile old fart until his socialist VP takes over, well that will be on each of them for the REST OF THEIR LIVES!
But they need to listen to this case!
NO MORE BULLSHIT!
I want POTUS to prevail as much as anyone,but I see a real possibility that the end result will be President Biden (gag).
The way this could happen is that the SCOTUS throws out the illegal votes and then rules that the “remedy” will be that the State Legislators will choose the slate of Electors. The same Legislators who seem to be hell bent on throwing the Election to Biden. They have dug in on this position and this ruling will make their choice Constitutionally legitimate.
HOORAY!! My state, TN, has joined!!
“Do we know exactly which other states have actually joined as plaintiffs”
I think no other states. Just Texas.
What is it with these guys. Yes, the betting man would bet that this is going nowhere. But tactical superiority is not about betting. It is about getting your way despite teh bare numerical odds.
And, I hope people have seen the brilliance of Paxton's constitutional arguments about the vice presidential election. That was shear genius.
The "five" know what is at stake is the rule of law under the US Constitution itself. Every one of them has worked his / her tail off to get that position, and Thomas, Kavanaugh and Barrett went through a hell that you might appreciate but most of the rest of us cannot.
So they are going to punt on the issue that defines whether they even have a real job defending the constitution in the future? Seriously?
This is the once in a life-time put up or shut up moment.
“This is not an attempt to overturn an election.”
Correct.
It’s an attempt to nullify 4 unlawful elections.
“This is the once in a life-time put up or shut up moment.”
I agree. SCOTUS punting on Texas dissolves the Union.
I cannot, for one, believe that he simply thought he would “win” and sweep all of this under the rug.
I look back on 2016 with a new perspective, now. This was the machine that Hillary’s non-existent “campaign” was based upon. I am thinking, now, that Trump knew what was going on way before, and it is why he ran.
In 2016, he beat the cheat, so he could be President, but victory was hardly the impetus for fighting a fraud that lost.
I wondered at his very late campaign of rallies in 2020. Now, I think he was planning to break the cheat and expose it.
I am not sure what Ace you are looking for. I think this is it. It is hard to imagine a strategy that will expose that Americans have been lied to and cheated at the highest political levels for decades.
I think this is it. He will be declared the winner over a Press doing nothing but stoking the fires in burning cities. Patton said Americans hate a quitter, and they like a cheater even less. This is an attempt to fix what is wrong in a way that does not tear the country apart. AS CHINA WOULD LIKE!
Here is my take - I believe that Trump and his trusted voter fraud team figured out every nuance of the dems stealing elections. I believe that they figured out the entire machine and software steal and where the servers were located. (That is the only way to understand how they could have found and seized the Frankfort servers so quickly.)
The plan had to be catching them in the act. The servers were located quickly, however the mail-in stuff would be a little trickier. Trump did something that he is a master at - he never let on about the servers or that he even knew about them. All he did was complain about them trying to steal the election. The dems went "Whew! He knows nothing. Keep going comrades!"
Remember the "Space Force" and how the media made fun of him? Well, I have heard that he used that newly created entity to gather the most loyal military and they were given the task to get the servers. Not prevent what was to happen, but to get the servers in Frankfort and Barcelona. The Frankfort servers had the true total of the vote and the Barcelona servers had the vote after the algorithm was applied. In Frankfort, at the CIA headquarters they found Gina Hapsel overseeing the steal. Talk about an open and shut case.
The true vote, before the algorithm was applied had Trump winning 410 Electoral votes and between 80 to 100 million votes.
We have an amazing President. I would not want to play a hand of poker with him if I was really wanting to win.
“Productive states cannot be forced to bail out failed states such as California...”
How has any “productive” state bailed out CA?
That’s utter nonsense on its face.
If all stories are true when is he going to reveal this information??
If “punting” means letting the state legislators pick the President, I will agree with that. It’s possible that republican legislators will still vote for Biden. If the Supreme Court defines that as “punting”, I’m all for that as long as the Republican legislators actually vote for Trump.
if SCOTUS punts, it would be like a mass suicide in slow motion with prospective D SCOTUS packing (yes?) unless there is a downstream sure thing in the opposing direction...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.