“Article II provides that only state legislatures can make rules for presidential elections.”
That was basically what I said. You can downplay how I stated it by using quotes, but it’s still the same thing.
My question was if the evidence about fraud could be submitted.
The President's lawyer points out it isn't necessary to prove, therefore, not necessary to submit.
Violations of Article II have already been proven by the defendant states' SOS/Judiciary known/stated actions.
SCOTUS isn't going to hear a case like this based on fraud. However...they have full, original jurisdiction to hear Article II violations that cause a dispute between states.
Question remains, will they have the guts to taken on this nuclear hot potato, federal government altering issue!?!? We shall see, probably by the end of this week.