The whole thing only lasted two hours.
The Trump team did not present any evidence because they were not allowed to.
Russell allowed them to enter evidence that courts in the state would normally block — expert testimony without sufficient expertise, hearsay, and so on. In other words, Team Trump got their full day in court, and still lost. Russell ruled against every affidavit, every expert, and every legal argument they presented. The ruling last night from the state supreme court reviewed that record and pointedly notes that not only did the campaign fail to meet a preponderance-of-evidence standard even while including inadmissible presentations, they unanimously agreed with Russell that it didn’t even meet lower evidentiary standards. It’s a stunning condemnation of Team Trump’s legal work and claims in the election.
How did they present all this in 2 hours? Was the 2 hour reference to the Nevada Supreme Court? But they just reviewed what was already presented to Judge Russell?
According to the story the judge ruled against their evidence. I don't know on what grounds.
If that were true, why didn't they object on appeal? In fact, they were given two full days to take depositions of witnesses and present the transcripts to the court. Read the judge's opinion.